2007-01-10 09:54:46 · 9 answers · asked by Mister E 2 in Sports ➔ Baseball
IN 2006 WILL CLARK ONLY RECEIVED 4% OF THE VOTE. UNDER MLB HOF RULES IF YOU ONLY RECEIVE LESS THAN 5% OF THE VOTE THEN YOU LOSE YOUR PLACE ON THE BALLOT.
2007-01-10 10:24:49 · answer #1 · answered by smitty 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
In last year's voting, which was his first year of eligibility, Clark received 23 votes (4.4%), which was 3 votes short of the 5% needed to remain on the ballot.
2007-01-10 18:51:10 · answer #2 · answered by JerH1 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i dont think it would have mattered if his name was on the list because it had Mark McGwire and Jose Canseco who both fell short in balloting and as I can recall being an A's fan.. the A's and the Bash Brothers swept the Gaints in the World Series in 89. He was a great player tho.. but i think in order to get into the Hall he will have to be on a relatively "weak" HOF ballot.
2007-01-10 18:37:52 · answer #3 · answered by Get Money 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
He didn't get enough votes to stay on the ballot. He was great to watch, but unfortunately, just not a Hall of Famer.
2007-01-11 00:59:04 · answer #4 · answered by Eho 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Did not put up enough career numbers and did not have more than a couple of great years.
2007-01-10 21:16:57 · answer #5 · answered by PearApple 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Thrill is gone!
2007-01-10 19:54:06 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
neither is dale murphy, times up not getting in it.
2014-11-20 14:58:33 · answer #7 · answered by danton s 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
he wasnt that good
2007-01-10 19:55:01 · answer #8 · answered by yankeesalltheway 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
cause he sucks
2007-01-10 19:07:04 · answer #9 · answered by pintsizedpedro 1 · 0⤊ 2⤋