if you ever saw it done..you would say yes..but we do it all the time..what if little girls started to get it done..when what and they do it girls in the Suddan..
2007-01-10 09:42:52 · 11 answers · asked by Kingofreportedabuse 3 in Health ➔ Men's Health
yes.it is done to girls and boys.it is mutilation.
2007-01-10 10:08:19 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 5⤋
NO definitely not, that's what some irrational and radical anti-circumcision groups and lobbies want everyone else to beleive.
Comparing male circumcision to the so-called female circumcision is something alse due these groups, again with the goal of misleading and manipulationg the general public.
I have seen the circumcision of my three sons and none of them had any problem. The doctor used an anesthesic cream, so they virtually felt no pain. You have probably seen a video provided by these racal groups.
2007-01-11 18:24:59 · answer #2 · answered by Scuba 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Male circumcision is not abuse! it is one of the best things that a parent can do for a son, giving him better hygiene, comfort, appearance, self-esteem and when he grows up FAR better sexual sensation for both himself and his female partner(s) The disgusting genital mutilation which is done to girls in some countries is nothing like male circumcision and has the opposite effect. The two cannot be compared in any way. Ignore the anti-circ answers - they come from young inexperienced women (like "Maple") or from uncircumcised men, so what can they know?
2007-01-11 07:03:24 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
The Jewish religon has done this for thousands of years to prevent infections in boys
The muslims do this to girls to try to prevent them from enjoying sex
2007-01-10 18:21:04 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
Yes i saw it done on my son however it was because he had adhesions and could not pee. My second son was also done to prevent adhesions so not everyone does it just because they want to. By the way both of my sons had lidocain use to prevent any pain and was given pain meds while it healed. Most parents that choose to dothis can request pain reliever for their son
2007-01-10 18:06:36 · answer #5 · answered by littledevilinyourcup 5 · 3⤊ 3⤋
no i dont think it is for little boys.. it helps them to be clean...now for the girls i think it is child abuse.. the only reason it is done to the girls is because they believe it help keep them from straying away from their husband .. when it is dont to a girl they take away the clitoris so she gets no enjoyment from sex... she is just there for her husband pleasure
2007-01-10 18:10:06 · answer #6 · answered by ? 5 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Yes, it is child abuse and should be illegal unless there is an urgent medical reason. Parents should not have the right to mutilate their sons or their daughters.
If you have any doubts, watch the video at http://www.cirp.org/library/procedure/plastibell/ - but have a barf bag nearby.
2007-01-10 20:17:30 · answer #7 · answered by Maple 7 · 2⤊ 5⤋
No I would be pissed if my mom decided not give me one it's just more sanitary for a male to be circumsized.
2007-01-10 23:27:35 · answer #8 · answered by 412 KiD 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋
EVERYONE STATES IT IS CLEANER...TEACH YOUR BOYS TO CLEAN HIS PENIS PROPERLY AND YOU WONT HAVE TO MUTILATE HIS BODY.....STEP UP PARENTS STOP HURTING YOUR BABIES......I DO UNDERSTAND SOMETIMES IT IS NECESSARY...BUT TO DO IT BECAUSE IT " LOOKS BETTER" OR ITS CLEANER IS A LOAD OF S*IT
2007-01-11 06:39:09 · answer #9 · answered by lovebird2660 1 · 2⤊ 3⤋
no, its for ethical purposes to be clean...
2007-01-11 02:13:01 · answer #10 · answered by DeathNote 4 · 2⤊ 4⤋