No, it would be foolish to do so.
2007-01-10 09:12:40
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
Most likely the new president will be a democrat, and he(or she) will probably take steps to get out of Iraq (cause most democrats arn't hicks)
But Bush has already screwed the next president, cause no matter what there will be a catastrophe, and the new president will be blamed
Bush is just a coward that dosn't want to accept responsibility
2007-01-10 17:15:35
·
answer #2
·
answered by sur2124 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
Pulling out of Iraq is not as simple as it seems. We owe it to the Iraqi people and to those who gave their lives to finish what we started. You may not agree with the war or why we went there but it is too late for that. We are there, their president has been executed and their country is torn to pieces. We have to help them establish a solid central government and rebuild the infrastructure that we destroyed. These people are entitled to peace and prosperity as well as health and education. To pull out before this is accomplished is unthinkable.
2007-01-10 17:17:02
·
answer #3
·
answered by lbuajlw 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
Of course not. The FACT is that even if Dems make it sound like they're against the war, both republicans and democrats in American politics understand that CAPITAL is served before anything else. It is useless for the public to be divided along partisan lines because it only occupies our time but changes nothing in REAL time!
2007-01-10 17:18:56
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I truly hope not.
That would be a major mistake.
If the next pres. does pull out of Iraq, then years down the road, when a new dictator has risen and threatens his people and the world, I HOPE that America views that Pres. as the worst in history...
EXACTLY lbuajlw :-)
2007-01-10 17:20:37
·
answer #5
·
answered by Pooky 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Hard To Know Yet.... We Will See What Kind Of A Prez The Next One Turns Out To Be.
2007-01-10 17:12:00
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
I am not sure, but I think that in the past every country we have been involved in a conflict with we are still there. So, why would Iraq be any different?
2007-01-10 17:14:56
·
answer #7
·
answered by Aliz 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
well if we are to leave then the country will probably end up like somalia and im sure any sane person can figure that out since they are having trouble with violence now think of if the people we are fighting take over so i think were their for at least 8 years and possibly up to 20 at the most
2007-01-10 17:12:40
·
answer #8
·
answered by blabster91 2
·
2⤊
1⤋
no,because oil worth millions of income for u.s.a,and also usa cant get any other good place than iraq in any part of the world.first let him come then we can express our views on him.
2007-01-10 17:13:30
·
answer #9
·
answered by ganesh n 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
No, I think that president Rice will be sensible enough to leave the troops there until the job is done.
Condi '08!
2007-01-10 17:12:08
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋
I HOPE SO!
the new pres lets hope he/she is the kind that is actually gonna get things done and fix up the damn country and start setting priorities in order, dealing with problems on the home front being foremost!
2007-01-10 17:12:53
·
answer #11
·
answered by Darleen W 2
·
2⤊
3⤋