Which advisors are actually saying that this will work, Condi?
2007-01-10 09:08:09 · 6 answers · asked by breastfed43 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
for one the Iraq surrender group you praised said that it would be a good idea and for two the congress have no say in what the commander and chief does in battle because that is his job. that whole checks and balances thing. civics class anyone?
2007-01-10 09:13:19 · answer #1 · answered by CaptainObvious 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Why they have! Just like the new speaker of the house said they would, the new leadership in the House is showing it's muscle. Why just today, Nancy Pelosi declared there would be no more smoking on the floor of the House. Now that's political conviction that rivals people like Adams, Jackson, Jefferson, and even Burgler, I mean Berger!
I believe the most convincing advice came from the Pentagon! That is sure the hell the advice I would follow.
2007-01-10 17:20:14 · answer #2 · answered by briang731/ bvincent 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
They can only do so much. Especially when you consider that the Saudi"s main man is in the Whitehouse...........................
Are we really so naive as to believe that our troops are there to protect Iraqi interests?
If you want to know who calls the shots in the Middle East - look toward Mecca!
2007-01-10 17:44:02 · answer #3 · answered by Huero 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Dems have got to let Bush take the blame. Bush will get whatever he wants or Dems will get a big share of the blame for the failure of the war. It is all about what they call "POLITICAL COVER".
2007-01-10 17:56:06 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well, let's see-- if they refuse to give him the $1.2+ billion he's looking for, he won't go anywhere.
2007-01-10 17:14:33 · answer #5 · answered by dapixelator 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
because democrates are a bunch of ******* and DA's
2007-01-10 17:11:00 · answer #6 · answered by blabster91 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋