English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I don't agree with Bush's decisions to go into Iraq but some people do so I respect their opinions. However I do think Bush has a lot to answer for as he has gone to war even though many Americans didnt want to.

Do you think if he were the leader of a 3rd world country he would suffer the same fate as Sadam? But because he is the President of the US he will get off scott free?

I personally believe (to a certain extent) this is the case.

Comments?

2007-01-10 08:32:05 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Government

007 raises a good point, he is only human. But he has killed plenty of Iraqis, is that not as bad as killing Americans then?

2007-01-10 08:38:06 · update #1

8 answers

presidents are so supposed to do whats best for their countries right? Well i believe our country has suffered a lot under his "rule". Look at how bad our economy is..and i know people want to blame that on Illegal immigrants but all of it we cant..most i know work and pay taxes with tax ids..anyways..what about his war..how much is that costing us in money and lives...and where is he all the time..it seems like everytime I hear something about him he's at his damn ranch..Can't stand the man..can't wait till we get a real president in office

2007-01-10 08:44:10 · answer #1 · answered by eightysgurl04 2 · 0 0

Actually, most World Leaders do not meet the fate of Sadam. Most face firing squads when the coup-de-ta ousts them. Bush has, in his own way, tried to make the world a safer place. Sure, he's not perfect, but who is. He is trying to fight terrorism. did we hold it against Ronald Reagan when he ordered the bombin of Libya? No, because of what they did. Sadam was an accomplice to the Al Quieda, and was dealt with accordingly.

B-Cool

2007-01-10 16:54:44 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The war was approved by both houses OK-ed by UN and is legal
Support the commander and chief and the troops
Bush was elected to be president twice
Bush wasn't responsible for the death of 300,000 of his own people how can you in good conscience compare the 2
What crimes has Bush commited?

2007-01-10 16:39:58 · answer #3 · answered by bob b 3 · 0 1

If he were the leader of a third-world country, I suspect that the citizens/military would have taken justice into their own hands long ago and deposed him, especially if the military of that third-world country thought as little of him as our military apparently does.

2007-01-10 16:40:16 · answer #4 · answered by Patrick 5 · 0 0

If everyone agree about every thing there would be no need for a government, democracy,laws, and no need for Dem's or reps. He is ultimately trying to do what it right and just. He is fighting for what he believes in. PEACE

2007-01-10 16:44:55 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

yes, i believe he is very similar to saddam, he is trying to be a dictator. he wants things his way or the highway and that just cannot work in the type of government our country has been established on.

with his propaganda, i do believe, he would be hunted down by another country the same way he did saddam.

2007-01-10 16:37:02 · answer #6 · answered by nc_strawberry 4 · 0 2

no i do not, he did not gas complete towns, he did not gas or kill any Americans, he did back up a UN resolution that the UN would never do. He did kill terrorist and is keeping us safe. I think he has made mistakes, but he is human.

2007-01-10 16:37:03 · answer #7 · answered by 007 4 · 1 3

don't know

2007-01-10 16:34:45 · answer #8 · answered by joe 1 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers