I can't stand him either and putting him up against Vanilla Ice just stirred up all the little Cena lovers.
2007-01-10 09:50:04
·
answer #1
·
answered by Susan L 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
He's just a freak of nature.
He cant wrestle, or barely move.
He's just big, slow and untalented.
to earlier comments-
1. Big show isnt in the same category as these other people. He didnt apply himself but he had matches where he looked like the best "big man" ever.
2. Monty brown? monty friggin brown??!? He is not just in the same boat as Khali, he's the captain. He was the only bad thing on TNA until he left. He is more useless and a worse wrestler than lashley and Batista both.
I dont know why they only push steroid freaks and giants. If they had always done this we wouldnt have the smaller legends like Austin or HBK.
2007-01-10 16:49:09
·
answer #2
·
answered by anonymous w 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Oh yeah I hate The Great Kahli he is weak and mic skills are bad. I wish The Great Kahli not here ECW or WWE move somewhere like weak federation side not ROH or TNA okay. And yes The Undertaker defeat The Great Kahli last year on Last Man Stading on Smackdown. Taker won now no one not going defeat
The Great Kahli there is no way no 7 foot wrestlers anymore. :(
Please someone beat The Great Kahli because he is 7'3 and skills are bad and mic skills are bad too god okay sorry about that.
2007-01-10 16:40:29
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I do. WWE should be about matches like the one last night on ECW between Lashley and Van Dam. It was two well-matched wrestlers in a technical style. You can't get that from Khali. They should have dropped him after the last man standing match.
p.s. I personally would like to see the #1 contender be Montie Brown, since I live in Massachusetts and am a huge Patriots fan.
2007-01-10 16:37:25
·
answer #4
·
answered by Harry A 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Well he is a better wrestler than other huge men wwe had over the years..Giant Gonzales was worse wrestler..Khali is not the wrestler Big Show is though,Big Show is much heavier than him and still is more athletic.I dont think he will be around more than a year or so cause he sucks on the mic too
2007-01-14 09:03:50
·
answer #5
·
answered by Dan07 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
U people who put down khali r all haters. U people have to get down wid da brown!!! Khali is a great fighter. Besides, u dont have to be a great wrestler to be in wwe. Look at yokozuna or ken shamrock. they were fighters, not wrestlers and they still had sucess. Khali just needs time. he will soon shine!!!
2007-01-10 17:39:51
·
answer #6
·
answered by JAR 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
We all hate him very much. But he really needs to lears some new moves. You see the WWE loves to promote big guys with no talent.
Examples: Vader, Andre The Giant, Batista, Khali, Big Show etc.
2007-01-10 16:35:49
·
answer #7
·
answered by CodeRed 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
i completely disagree with u. is that a joke to defeat undertaker so many time. he has been defeated only one time by UT. if u say khali is stupid thatn what is umaga?
khali has got the talent and size. the only thing lacking in him is EXPIRIENCE. hope u have rectified ur mistake and if not thatn u r a big fool.
2007-01-10 16:43:01
·
answer #8
·
answered by FRIENDS FOREVER 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Great Khali can't wrestle for life. He's just big. His moves are chops, chokebombs, and...well that's it. He was better off in India.
2007-01-10 16:34:14
·
answer #9
·
answered by WizAW3S0ME 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
He only has 4 moves and cant run so he needs to go back in the movie business
2007-01-10 16:31:36
·
answer #10
·
answered by Matt: aka; Edge is world champ!! 6
·
3⤊
0⤋