Neither did the question that looms most obviously over the execution as far as Socialist Worker is concerned: If Saddam Hussein deserved to be hung, then what about the leaders of the U.S. government, who ordered two barbaric onslaughts on Iraq, linked by more than a decade of the strictest economic blockade in history?
When will George Bush--Junior or Senior--or Dick Cheney or Donald Rumsfeld or Colin Powell or Condoleezza Rice or Tony Blair or Bill Clinton and Al Gore stand trial?
Saddam Hussein is accused of responsibility in the deaths of many thousands. The Iraqi victims of the U.S. war machine number in the millions.
When Baghdad fell in 2003, the media filled the airwaves with images of Hussein’s palaces and the luxuries he enjoyed amid a devastated and impoverished country. The U.S. occupiers moved into those palaces--and almost four years later, the lives of most Iraqis have grown more impoverished.
2007-01-10 08:25:39 · 17 answers · asked by I Love America! 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
http://www.socialistworker.org/2007-1/614/614_03_Hussein.shtml
2007-01-10 08:31:04 · update #1
You do know that HELL doesn't have any water down there for you, right?
2007-01-10 08:29:05 · answer #1 · answered by #1 "Abuela" 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The information are that it is not against the regulation to salary war against a sovereign united states of america, that's what they call war. all and sundry alongside with congress subsidized President Bush after 911 and signed a announcement of war and now simply by fact issues did not bypass as predicted all and sundry that subsidized him now desires to take a distinctive place for political reasons. i don't trust all that occurred and actual have faith the war on terror could have been fought better someplace else than in Iraq yet i did not vote for Bush, on the different hand i don't blame him right now for all that has occurred. The rats that bypass away the sinking deliver are the real scoundrels right here.
2016-10-30 13:42:25 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
More than a blockade. Violating the Geneva Conventions and setting up secret CIA torture camps in other county's like Poland!
He also unilaterally, against the UN Charter, attacked a sovereign nation! That is against international law! Moreover, he had no reason to attack them!
Bush certainly can't claim Hussein attacked us first as he wasn't a terrorist and had nothing to do with 9/11!
2007-01-10 08:34:12 · answer #3 · answered by cantcu 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
All you Bush-haters out there need to get over the fact that the President has done nothing illegal. If he had, believe me the Democrats would have begun impeachment procedures by now.
Get over it, people...
2007-01-10 08:31:36 · answer #4 · answered by Team Chief 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He will never be tried. Because he is the American President, if he were the leader of some 3rd world country he would have been punished by now.
2007-01-10 08:29:15 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Never, there is no evidence of a crime.
I also see that DaBigg posts the same copied BS that everyone posts. Way to think for yourself buddy!
2007-01-10 08:30:38 · answer #6 · answered by msi_cord 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
So, when are you moving back to North Korea to be with your lover Kim Jong IL? Your name must be Men Ta Lee IL, right?
2007-01-10 08:35:12 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
He is not guilty of any crime.
I got an idea why don't you pack your bags and go to Cuba.
See how well it is going down there.
Promise to not come back & give up your citzenship to the US forever I will pay for the one way ticket.
2007-01-10 08:32:31 · answer #8 · answered by Max50 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Our President is not perfect but he should be prayed for not vilified. He has done nothing that justifies being put on trial for!
2007-01-10 08:31:16 · answer #9 · answered by attyvette 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Not going to happen. but nice typing though.
2007-01-10 08:29:08 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋