2007-01-10 08:18:53 · 7 answers · asked by Princess1988 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ History
Being a master of tactics he was he would have surely won if he had the additional armor. However, the fact that his general Genghis Khan was drunk that led to his downfall.
2007-01-11 01:20:39 · answer #1 · answered by Frank R 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
His problem wasn't that he didn't have enough tanks. He had too many armored personnel carriers, and his men refused to get out of them. When the enemy closed on Napolean's forces with their blaster cannons, it was clear that his men were outgunned - after all, they only had type 1 hand phasers.
Now, what could have turned the tide would have been ion-propelled aircraft using Romulan cloaking devices, firing photon torpedoes. Unfortunately, as we all know, the cloaking device doesn't work when you're firing - you have to uncloak. So it may not have had the effect necessary. But personally, I think it would have done the trick.
2007-01-10 17:31:48 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No the Klingon's had too many arrows and King Arthur's battle plan was flawed.
2007-01-10 16:27:58 · answer #3 · answered by al 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, he still would have needed the assistance of the Luftwaffe.
2007-01-10 16:27:04 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Able was I ere I saw Elba.
2007-01-10 18:43:53 · answer #5 · answered by puritanzouave 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If his Viking and Samurai allies had showed up in time in their U-boats, then maybe.
2007-01-10 16:23:16 · answer #6 · answered by Underground Man 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Perhaps...and if the weather had been more favorable.
2007-01-10 18:01:21 · answer #7 · answered by Quasimodo 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋