English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

A fossil is the remains or traces of a plant or animal that have been preserved in the Earth's crust down to the present day. Fossils collected from all over the world are our most important source of information about the species that have existed on Earth since life began.
The skeletons of living things whose contact with the air was suddenly interrupted have come down, often perfectly preserved, to the present day. Research into these fossils permits us to learn increasingly detailed information about extinct animals or plants. Most basically, this information also tells us about which living things existed during which period.

2007-01-10 07:54:18 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities Philosophy

For evolutionists, fossil specimens, often hundreds of millions of years old, are all tools they can use in line with their own theories. Evolutionists take a fossil, link it arbitrarily to some present-day species, and then claim that the fossil is the ancestor of the living organism in question. Upon this premise, they then construct dramatic and detailed scenarios. If the fossil in question is a fish, for example, they claim on the basis of a few bones that it possesses primitive features, newly developing organs and limbs in the process of undergoing a transition to a "higher" life form. They write books about the creature, hold conferences, and exhibit it as the intermediate form or "missing link" they have been seeking for so long.
That is, until they find themselves looking at a living specimen of this supposedly extinct creature!

2007-01-10 07:55:19 · update #1

When a living thing emerges in the same form it was known to have existed in millions of years ago, it of course demolishes all the evolutionist fables told about it. Its simple presence demonstrates that a living organism that—according to Darwinists' claims—should have undergone considerable evolution after the course of millions of years, somehow remained immune to the process. Moreover, it proves that at a time when, again according to evolution, only primitive forms of life were in existence, fully developed life forms with complex features and their own unique structures were already thriving. The creature that evolutionists imagine to be "primitive" is in fact nothing of the sort. In other words, the deceptive nature of invalid claims regarding "transition from a single-celled organism," "an intermediate form" and "a primitive life-form" is soon realized. Eventually, important evidence proves that the "process of gradual evolution" is nothing but a myth.

2007-01-10 07:56:06 · update #2

All these specimens manifest one single truth: Living things did not come into being through the fictitious processes of the theory of evolution, but were created in a single moment. Today's living things, with all their perfect features as manifestations of God's superior artistry, possess exactly the same splendor and perfection as their counterparts that existed millions of years ago. Once all evolutionist speculation and claims are eliminated, the fact of creation is revealed for all to see—albeit in a manner totally unexpected by evolutionists.
"Living fossils" are proofs that all the living things on Earth, past and present, were created from nothing; and that each one, possessing complex and superior attributes, is a miracle of God. This means that in fact, the supposed developmental process that evolutionists claim took place over millions of years never happened at all. Fictitious intermediate forms disappear along with fictitious scenarios.

2007-01-10 07:56:50 · update #3

Wonderful books (All free, without charge,):

HOW FOSSILS OVERTURNED EVOLUTION
http://www.harunyahya.com/books/darwinism/living_fossils/fossils_01.php

ATLAS OF CREATION
http://www.harunyahya.com/books/darwinism/atlas_creation/atlas_creation_01.php

Evolution Deceit
http://fs.harunyahya.net/popup/Download.php?WorkNumber=462&Format=pdf

The Dark Spell of Darwinism
http://api.fmanager.net/api_v1/xmlapi.php?dev-t=EDCRFV&with=mod=file,id=19945


Wonderful Videos(All free, without charge,):


THE COLLAPSE OF EVOLUTION :
http://www.harunyahya.com/m_video_detail.php?api_id=1245

ALLAH IS KNOWN THROUGH REASON:

http://www.harunyahya.com/m_video_detail.php?api_id=1069

THE TRUTH OF THE LIFE OF THIS WORLD
http://www.harunyahya.com/m_video_detail.php?api_id=1276

=* FOR ANY HELP FEEL FREE TO E-MAIL ME ON *=
smiling4ever222@hotmail.com

2007-01-10 07:57:32 · update #4

7 answers

Wrong

Sorry, thanx for playing

2007-01-10 08:59:09 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Nice try, but most fossil intermediates in vertebrate evolution have indeed been found. A clear line of fossils now traces the transition between whales and hoofed mammals, between reptiles and mammals, between dinosaurs and birds, between apes and humans. The fossil evidence of evolution between major forms is compelling.

The sad part is, we now know there's a reason for people believing in creation, nueroscientists can artificially trigger a certain part of your limbic system to create a 'religious' feeling. Obsolete genes do not die overnite, so we'll be seeing a distorted worldview from you and others for some time to come.

2007-01-10 12:24:41 · answer #2 · answered by Its not me Its u 7 · 2 0

I'm afraid this argument is based on a fundamental misunderstanding of evolution. I as far as I understand it your basic argument is that living fossils should have changed over time according to evolutionary theory. However evolutionary theory simply doesn't say that.

Evolution by natural selection says that individuals who produce lots of offspring will shape future generations. So any adaptations which allow an individual to produce more offspring will be selected for. In this way groups of organisms diverge into different species.

When we look at living fossils such coelacanth, crocodiles and horseshoe crabs, all we see are clades of organisms where natural selection has favored one particular body plan over a very long period of time.

For example whilst the prey of crocodiles has evolved over time the effectiveness of their hunting techniques and the fact that their habitat has remained very similar for millions of years means that the selection pressures have remained the same meaning that the crocodiles have remained the same.

2007-01-10 09:55:44 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Your logic seems to be based on the 'discovery' of species that had been thought extinct. However, you seem to link this to the believe that 'life was created at once'. Well, they often find very old species - however, they are typically in very remote/isolated areas. So if you find a 'dinosaur' fish at the bottom of the atlantic trench you probably didn't know it was there because you did not have access.

Oh - and so how do you explain fossils?

2007-01-18 06:29:20 · answer #4 · answered by Willr 2 · 0 0

"...and that each one, possessing complex and superior attributes, is a miracle of God. This means that in fact, the supposed developmental process that evolutionists claim took place over millions of years never happened at all"

The "miracle of God" and Evolution are NOT mutually exclusive DOH!

2007-01-16 20:53:44 · answer #5 · answered by mark [mjimih] 3 · 1 0

Science is never fictitious. There is evidence for evolution. Stop using lies to spread the so called "Truth".

2007-01-10 09:04:14 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

you have totally convinced me that i've been duped by the devil for so many years, now. hopefully, the fundamentalist leadership, and other similarly situated sociopaths, will forgive me, for a substantial fee no doubt, and welcome me into the growing ranks of the terminally deluded. ah, fundamentalist religion, surely the bastion of the easily led ;-)

2007-01-10 10:39:13 · answer #7 · answered by drakke1 6 · 1 1

Evolution is the fact u must believe

2007-01-10 09:18:44 · answer #8 · answered by The dude 5 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers