English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

A fossil is the remains or traces of a plant or animal that have been preserved in the Earth's crust down to the present day. Fossils collected from all over the world are our most important source of information about the species that have existed on Earth since life began.
The skeletons of living things whose contact with the air was suddenly interrupted have come down, often perfectly preserved, to the present day. Research into these fossils permits us to learn increasingly detailed information about extinct animals or plants. Most basically, this information also tells us about which living things existed during which period.

2007-01-10 07:54:13 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous in Education & Reference Higher Education (University +)

For evolutionists, fossil specimens, often hundreds of millions of years old, are all tools they can use in line with their own theories. Evolutionists take a fossil, link it arbitrarily to some present-day species, and then claim that the fossil is the ancestor of the living organism in question. Upon this premise, they then construct dramatic and detailed scenarios. If the fossil in question is a fish, for example, they claim on the basis of a few bones that it possesses primitive features, newly developing organs and limbs in the process of undergoing a transition to a "higher" life form. They write books about the creature, hold conferences, and exhibit it as the intermediate form or "missing link" they have been seeking for so long.
That is, until they find themselves looking at a living specimen of this supposedly extinct creature!

2007-01-10 07:55:17 · update #1

When a living thing emerges in the same form it was known to have existed in millions of years ago, it of course demolishes all the evolutionist fables told about it. Its simple presence demonstrates that a living organism that—according to Darwinists' claims—should have undergone considerable evolution after the course of millions of years, somehow remained immune to the process. Moreover, it proves that at a time when, again according to evolution, only primitive forms of life were in existence, fully developed life forms with complex features and their own unique structures were already thriving. The creature that evolutionists imagine to be "primitive" is in fact nothing of the sort. In other words, the deceptive nature of invalid claims regarding "transition from a single-celled organism," "an intermediate form" and "a primitive life-form" is soon realized. Eventually, important evidence proves that the "process of gradual evolution" is nothing but a myth.

2007-01-10 07:56:04 · update #2

All these specimens manifest one single truth: Living things did not come into being through the fictitious processes of the theory of evolution, but were created in a single moment. Today's living things, with all their perfect features as manifestations of God's superior artistry, possess exactly the same splendor and perfection as their counterparts that existed millions of years ago. Once all evolutionist speculation and claims are eliminated, the fact of creation is revealed for all to see—albeit in a manner totally unexpected by evolutionists.
"Living fossils" are proofs that all the living things on Earth, past and present, were created from nothing; and that each one, possessing complex and superior attributes, is a miracle of God. This means that in fact, the supposed developmental process that evolutionists claim took place over millions of years never happened at all. Fictitious intermediate forms disappear along with fictitious scenarios.

2007-01-10 07:56:53 · update #3

Wonderful books (All free, without charge,):

HOW FOSSILS OVERTURNED EVOLUTION
http://www.harunyahya.com/books/darwinism/living_fossils/fossils_01.php

ATLAS OF CREATION
http://www.harunyahya.com/books/darwinism/atlas_creation/atlas_creation_01.php

Evolution Deceit
http://fs.harunyahya.net/popup/Download.php?WorkNumber=462&Format=pdf

The Dark Spell of Darwinism
http://api.fmanager.net/api_v1/xmlapi.php?dev-t=EDCRFV&with=mod=file,id=19945


Wonderful Videos(All free, without charge,):


THE COLLAPSE OF EVOLUTION :
http://www.harunyahya.com/m_video_detail.php?api_id=1245

ALLAH IS KNOWN THROUGH REASON:

http://www.harunyahya.com/m_video_detail.php?api_id=1069

THE TRUTH OF THE LIFE OF THIS WORLD
http://www.harunyahya.com/m_video_detail.php?api_id=1276

=* FOR ANY HELP FEEL FREE TO E-MAIL ME ON *=
smiling4ever222@hotmail.com

2007-01-10 07:57:28 · update #4

2 answers

You might want to take a course on logic and philosophy to find the errors in your thinking and the development of your argument. Starting with an answer and constructing an argument to fulfill it..generally causes problems. In research for example we are always attempting to reject the null hypothesis.

2007-01-10 12:42:24 · answer #1 · answered by Dr_Adventure 7 · 1 0

Actually "sexual evolution" has disproved the theory of evolution. Evolutionists can not explain Male/Female development. The reason they cannot and have not is because they would have to explain how the first sexual reproductive act occured which would require no less than fully functional reproductive systems in both the male and female and evolution doesn't allow for these type of Synchronistic Random Mutations. This is the law of Non-synchronistic Random Mutations.

2007-01-17 03:43:49 · answer #2 · answered by Asana Bodhitharta 2 · 0 0

Dream on -- it does no such thing. The fact that there are animals that have not evolved very much does not imply that other animals do not evolve.

Your argument is analogous to saying that since we can find elements on Earth, there can be no compound molecules.

2007-01-10 08:56:26 · answer #3 · answered by Ranto 7 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers