2007-01-10 07:37:12 · 7 answers · asked by Jackie j 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Books & Authors
They're all terrible. It would take millions of man-hours of work to make a decent universal translator, and so far no-one has made the effort. If they did, I imagine they'd probably charge for it.
The best of the lot at the moment seems to be babelfish. http://babelfish.altavista.com/
It's neither accurate nor reliable, but if you're willing to spend a little time deciphering its output you can get a general sense of what's going on in the page you're trying to read.
2007-01-10 09:24:27 · answer #1 · answered by Drew 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Babel Fish from Alta Vista used to work for my a couple of years back. Try using it
2016-05-23 05:41:28 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I like www.freetranslation.com
Keep in mind though, it's done by a computer so may not be accurate all the time. But it's the best I've seen.
2007-01-10 07:46:20 · answer #3 · answered by John C 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Google translation
http://www.google.com/language_tools?hl=en
2007-01-10 07:40:49 · answer #4 · answered by Nipi 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Have you tried Babel Fish?
2007-01-10 07:40:57 · answer #5 · answered by Underground Man 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
http://www.imtranslator.com/
Doesn't work all the time (so I wouldn't use it to cheat on homework), but it's pretty reliable, I think.
2007-01-10 07:41:52 · answer #6 · answered by oj 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
www.freetranslation.com
2007-01-10 07:44:20 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋