My point being as long as they get to you they wont cease.Show your patriotism by ignoring them they are simply stirrers.
2007-01-10
07:36:42
·
8 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Other - Politics & Government
Stingray nice name throw up at Steve Irwin is it.But to get to your answer another great example of making a lot of noise without actually saying any thing copy and paste is it learn to think for your self.
2007-01-10
13:34:31 ·
update #1
sprcpt-it would depend which side you are speaking for as to what you consider idiotic.
2007-01-10
13:39:24 ·
update #2
sandyjean-Its not the question or answer but the ranting and raving that goes with it.
2007-01-10
13:41:56 ·
update #3
.
2007-01-10 07:40:17
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Nemesis
You make an excellent point but it is so hard not to give them a little taste of their own medicine. They don't insult or bother me in the least therefore I enjoy it.
What they fail to realize is that they cannot insult or bother me because I am a Patriot!
To answer your question - It wouldn't matter if people responded or not - they have no basis or fact to their Anti Bush bashing so all that is left for them to do is stir the pot! They will continue stirring until their soup evaporates.
2007-01-10 15:46:50
·
answer #2
·
answered by LadySable 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
If you do not want to answer a question don't but that is not helping anything if a question is asked about Bush that person wants your feed back, and what is idiotic to you may be important to someone else.
2007-01-10 15:44:01
·
answer #3
·
answered by sandyjean 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Are you talking about the idiotic Bush questions claiming that he is this glowing personification of morality or the ones that tell it like it is.
2007-01-10 15:43:26
·
answer #4
·
answered by sprcpt 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
People feel disengaged from the political process. Ignored.
They need an escape valve, somewhere they can sound off
That's my excuse, anyway, and I'm sticking to it.
2007-01-10 15:44:52
·
answer #5
·
answered by Panama Jack 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
Hi,
My answer is directed at you, and Lady Sable. You want some basis and fact for questioning bush, which you refer to as bashing, well here are the 10 points favoring impeachment now before congress, and I challenge you and Lady Sable or any other republicans to explain away any of the following points which are soon to be submitted under articles of impeachment.
1. Violating the United Nations Charter by launching an illegal "War of Aggression" against Iraq without cause, using fraud to sell the war to Congress and the public, misusing government funds to begin bombing without Congressional authorization, and subjecting our military personnel to unnecessary harm, debilitating injuries, and deaths.
2. Violating U.S. and international law by authorizing the torture of thousands of captives, resulting in dozens of deaths, and keeping prisoners hidden from the International Committee of the Red Cross.
3. Violating the Constitution by arbitrarily detaining Americans, legal residents, and non-Americans, without due process, without charge, and without access to counsel.
4. Violating the Geneva Conventions by targeting civilians, journalists, hospitals, and ambulances, and using illegal weapons, including white phosphorous, depleted uranium, and a new type of napalm.
5. Violating U.S. law and the Constitution through widespread wiretapping of the phone calls and emails of Americans without a warrant.
6. Violating the Constitution by using "signing statements" to defy hundreds of laws passed by Congress.
7. Violating U.S. and state law by obstructing honest elections in 2000, 2002, 2004, and 2006.
8. Violating U.S. law by using paid propaganda and disinformation, selectively and misleadingly leaking classified information, and exposing the identity of a covert CIA operative working on sensitive WMD proliferation for political retribution.
9. Subverting the Constitution and abusing Presidential power by asserting a "Unitary Executive Theory" giving unlimited powers to the President, by obstructing efforts by Congress and the Courts to review and restrict Presidential actions, and by promoting and signing legislation negating the Bill of Rights and the Writ of Habeas Corpus.
10. Gross negligence in failing to assist New Orleans residents after Hurricane Katrina, in ignoring urgent warnings of an Al Qaeda attack prior to Sept. 11, 2001, and in increasing air pollution causing global warming.
Who want's to go first?
Darryl S.
2007-01-10 16:15:49
·
answer #6
·
answered by Stingray 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
Question to the person before me... what is "Anti Bush bashing"? Complimenting him?
2007-01-10 16:02:11
·
answer #7
·
answered by Megara 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
amen brother!!!
2007-01-10 15:44:28
·
answer #8
·
answered by Linda C 4
·
0⤊
1⤋