1) How did 19 Muslims (7 of whom are still alive), led by a sick Muslim on dialysis in a cave on the other side of the world, manage to outwit a 500 billion dollar defense system?
2) Why was Osama Bin Laden, on July 4 2001 while undergoing medical treatment at the American Hospital in Dubai, visited buy the CIA? Note that he was on the FBI and CIA MOST WANTED LISTS FOR HIS INVOLVEMENT IN THE USS COLE BOMBING.
http://s3.amazonaws.com/911timeline/2001/lefigaro103101.html
3) Why is OBL on the FBI or CIA most wanted list for the USS Cole and other alleged offenses but not for 9/11?
http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/terrorists/terbinladen.htm
4) Who faked OBL’s “admission” tape?
The Swedish company Dalle Molle Institute for Perceptual Artificial Intelligence confirmed that Bin Laden’s video “admission” was a fake.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/2526309.stm
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2002/11/29/1038386299712.html?oneclick=true
It looks nothing like Bin Laden. Bin Laden was suffering from terminal organ failure and was on dialysis. He was skinny sickly and pale. The guy in the video is fat healthy dark skinned and has completely different features.
http://italy.indymedia.org/uploads/2002/12/osama_fake_reals.jpg
http://www.propagandamatrix.com/osama_b_caught_on_tape.jpg
5) Why were at least 5 of the Muslim “fundamentalist” seen in LA and Vegas drinking, hiring hookers and snorting Cocaine?
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2001/10/04/MN102970.DTL
http://www.opinionjournal.com/best/?id=95001298
http://web.archive.org/web/20021119000120/http:/www.latimes.com/news/specials/911/la-na-plot-1sep01.story
http://web.archive.org/web/20031221013952/http:/www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/nation/ny-usflight232380680sep23.story
http://www.sptimes.com/News/092701/news_pf/TampaBay/Hijackers_linked_to_l.shtml
http://www.usatoday.com/news/sept11/2001/09/27/hijackers-photos.htm
http://www.sundayherald.com/18498
http://www.sptimes.com/News/091301/Worldandnation/FBI_seizes_records_of.shtml
http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/2001-09-26-ncguest1.htm
http://web.archive.org/web/20011010224657/http:/www.bostonherald.com/attack/investigation/ausprob10102001.htm
http://web.archive.org/web/20011011012426/http:/www.boston.com/dailyglobe2/283/metro/Hijackers_said_to_seek_prostitutes-.shtml
6) Why did five of the alleged 9/11 hijackers receive training at secure US military bases?
http://web.archive.org/web/20030927023624/www.msnbc.com/news/create_p1.asp?cp1=1&cpm=1&cpe=1&URL=msnbc.com/news/629529.asp
7) Why did the FBI try to cover up the fact that an alleged 9/11 hijacker rented room from an FBI informant?
http://www.villagevoice.com/news/0524,mondo1,64920,6.html
8) How did ALL the “hijackers” manage to get box cutters onto ALL 4 of the Airplanes when box cutters weren't allowed pre-9/11 by the airlines industry?
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/11/12/attack/main528967.shtml
9) Why was steel from the ground zero shipped to China and India to be melted down and recycled before any criminal investigation (into the largest crime on US soil in US history) could be performed? http://www.usatoday.com/news/nphoto.htm
http://www.china.org.cn/english/2002/Jan/25776.htm
http://securitysolutions.com/ar/security_gps_job_massive/
10) Why did Mayor Rudolph Giuliani ban all video and photography at the WTC ground zero?
http://www.boston.com/news/daily/26/photo_ban.htm
11) Why did an FAA manager mangle, cut, and destroy 9/11 tapes?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&contentId=A6632-2004May6¬Found=true
12) Why did the Bush admin initially oppose any kind of 9/11 investigation and stone wall it for OVER A YEAR? The attacks on Pearl Harbor, the USS Cole, the USS Liberty each took less than 7 days to commence an investigation.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/05/15/attack/main509096.shtml
13) Why was the 9/11 Commission given a measly $3 million dollar budget and 16 month time frame compared to the over $40 million spent on the five-year investigation of the Clintons?
http://web.archive.org/web/20030129093939/http:/www.washtimes.com/national/20030127-19783672.htm
14) If the 9/11 Commission was “independent” why were 2 of it own senior officials, Philip Zelikow and Jamie Gorelick, so closely involved in the events under investigation that they had to be interviewed as part of the inquiry?
http://web.archive.org/web/20050209145424/http:/www.upi.com/view.cfm?StoryID=20040115-024012-7011r
15) Why did some of the 9/11 commission conclude that the Pentagon's initial story of how it reacted to 9/11 may have been part of a deliberate effort to mislead the commission and the public and debated referring the matter to the Justice Department for a criminal investigation?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/01/AR2006080101300.html
16) Why did the White House and CIA keep key portions of 9/11 report classified dealing with Saudi Arabia?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A43291-2003Jul24
17) Why did President Bush, Vice President Cheney, White House Counsel Alberto Gonzales, and two other administration staff members meet behind closed doors with the 9/11 Commission, and refuse to testify before the panel or under oath and did not allow a recorder or stenographer to be present?
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/04/29/bush.911.commission/
2007-01-10 07:06:50 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
And those RE JUST SOME OF THE QUESTIONS that could be asked.It is beyond me how anyone can accept the official story
2007-01-10 07:11:27 · answer #1 · answered by Paul I 4 · 7⤊ 6⤋
Well the CIA meeting Bin Laden have to be lie or have been manipulated. The US have been trying to catch Bin Laden in several kidnap attempts with special forces, commando style for many years. It makes no sense the US will just visit him and say hello and let him be.
Gov keeping things classified is nothing new. They have strict protocol to keep gov secrets secret. But remember that every now and then 'leaks' do occur. Remember all the 'leaks' after WMD aftermass? Why isn't there any 'leak' from 'inside job' that is probably larger than WMD campaign. And no insider came forward. Not a single peep, single squeel, single criticism of 'inside job' from insiders.
911 'inside job' do raise weird questions, like...
If Tomahawk cruise missile hit Pentagon, that's 1000lbs of explosives, only leave hole about 20ft wide after the impact? When these missile can turn bunkers into dust.
May be its because plane's nose punched hole on heavy solid reinforced concrete wall, perhaps?
If 911 is intended for Iraq War execuse why didn't they say one of the hijacker was from Iraq or make direct link between 911 and Iraq? Instead they have to go through all kinds of trouble to make WMD case that was heavily criticized by everybody afterward.
US have been carrying out airstrikes in Iraq since 91. The US forces have been around Middle East, Iraq anyways why not just invent story about Saddam attacking US aircraft as execuse to go to war. Or US spy plane spotting some weapons site? Instead of killing 3000 of its own citizens?
All the questions you raise are not completely relevant to who caused 911. Its very weak indirect accusation and not much more.
Gonzales and others helped to draft presidential war power that is very controversial. He doesn't want to answer questions about secret prisons and way they're handled. That's why he avoids hearings and answering things underoath. Not that he knows 911 is 'inside job'
2007-01-11 14:09:55 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
It is not the first time a country used a false flag to help further their agenda. Hitler did it and this country has done it before as well. This time to start the ultimate war with no end in sight. The war against terrorism. They feed the big bankers and defense contractors. Gives cause to pass unconstitutional laws like the Patriot act, and slip in the open borders policy as well. Welcome to the North American Union. Prepare for your RFID chip. "What luck for rulers that men do not think." - Hitler "Big Brother in the form of an increasingly powerful government and in an increasingly powerful private sector will pile the records high with reasons why privacy should give way to national security, to law and order [...] and the like." - Justice William O. Douglas "Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both." - Benjamin Franklin "A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government." - Edward Abbey
2016-05-23 05:32:54 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I see that your pretty much on the same path as me....I could give my opinion...but that would be pointless at this moment....so i'm going to give you a URL of a good movie that I found very useful...I base the majority of my beliefs on this video....
2007-01-11 10:42:47 · answer #4 · answered by Valerie R 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
There are many, many questions that Popular Mechanics did not answer. It is a lame fall-back excuse for those who refuse to ask even one question about the events of that day.
2007-01-10 07:28:52 · answer #5 · answered by MishMash [I am not one of your fans] 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
1. How is hijacking a plane related to military defense? Nothing in common there. Stupid statement.
2. He wasn't. This is a transparent lie.
3. What, he needs to be on a list? Stuck on stupid are you?
4. Just because it is claimed, does not make it true.
5. Most Islamic fundamentalists don't stick to their "morality" when outside of Islamic countries.
6. They didn't. Another transparent lie.
7. Informant, not law-enforcement employee. Probably to protect his identify for safety, and for future use. Nothing nefarious.
8. Boxcutters? Heck, I used to carry 6" hunting knives on the plane with me - show them to the security at the checkpoint and walk on through or just put it in my carryon bag. It wasn't exactly a thorough search then.
9. What investigation was needed? Conspiracy nut!
10. Because it was a crime scene. More because they didn't want all those gawkers.
11. Who knows? It's not as if there could be any blockbuster stuff on it. The same people did testify at other times.
12. Wouldn't make sense to have the people who needed to be working to be stuck doing testimony. I don't see the big deal with the timing. Pray tell, how is it a big deal?
13. Ask Congress.
14. Beats me. I thought the panel was full of the wrong people.
15. So the NORAD officials didn't want to show how ineptly they reacted. We all know they didn't react well and didn't get any jets to where they needed to be when they were needed.
16. Because the info was confidential perhaps?
17. Because their discussion would cover much secret stuff, and as for the oath, Congress hasn't the authority to compel the president to testify under oath to them.
No big bad conspiracy, just small insignifcant facts blown out of proportion by fools and idiots.
2007-01-10 07:38:09 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 8⤋
The first question is nonsense. The idea that there are hijackers still alive has been discredited. It's also a fact that the attacks did not require a great deal of technology. It just required that the hijackers know how to fly a large plane once air born. Aside from that all it took was careful planning and patience.
After reading the first question I didn't see any reason in bothering with the rest.
2007-01-10 07:15:07 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 9⤋
Which ones, the one about the misquoted witness who said "LIKE a cruise missile," not cruise missile, or the one about how hot aluminum burns (enough to melt many other metals)?
We've seen it before, including here. I'll tell you what I told the other guy: if, in fact, our government did orchestrate that, then wise would be to play nice with them. They are truly powerful people.
2007-01-10 08:10:56 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 5⤋
http://www.letsroll911.org/phpwebsite/
visit and see what you think
2007-01-10 09:43:10 · answer #9 · answered by duy n 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
ah scew it, I was going to debunk everyone one of your points, but just visit these sites:
Debunking Sites:
http://911conspiracysmasher.blogspot.com/
http://www.911myths.com/
http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/research/4199607.html
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/158816635X/sr=8-1/qid=1155609077/ref=sr_1_1/104-6098036-7150331?ie=UTF8
http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/09/19/032851.php
http://www.slate.com/id/1008297/
http://www.debunk911myths.org/
http://www.debunking911.com/
http://www.jod911.com/
http://southerncrossreview.org/41/9-11.htm
http://www.lists.opn.org/pipermail/org.opn.lists.skeptix/Week-of-Mon-20060911/003261.html
http://www.politicalhobbyist.com/debunked/alexjones.html
http://www.lolinfowars.co.nr/
http://www.jnani.org/mrking/writings/911/king911.htm
http://gradeonegadfly.blogspot.com/2006/10/loose-change-on-upper-east-side-part-i.html
http://www.911cultwatch.org.uk/
http://www.infoshop.org/texts/debunking911.html
http://internetdetectives.biz/case/loose-change
http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5782277
http://www.uwgb.edu/dutchs/PSEUDOSC/911NutPhysics.HTM
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html
http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/
http://antitruther.blogspot.com/
http://thedoc911.blogspot.com/
http://www.iht.com/bin/print_ipub.php?file=/articles/2006/09/01/news/conspiracy.php
Reports:
http://wtc.nist.gov/
http://www.house.gov/science/hot/wtc/wtcreport.htm
http://www.gpoaccess.gov/911/
http://www.9-11commission.gov/
http://www.house.gov/science/hot/wtc/wtc-report/WTC_ch2.pdf
http://www-math.mit.edu/~bazant/WTC/WTC-asce.pdf
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2001/09/12/victim-capsule-flight77.htm
http://www.berkeleydailyplanet.com/article.cfm?archiveDate=10-07-01&storyID=7299
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/nyregion/20050812_WTC_GRAPHIC/9110285.PDF
http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/conspiracy/q0265.shtml
http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/conspiracy/q0274.shtml
http://www.asce.org/responds/
http://www.asce.org/pressroom/news/display_press.cfm?uid=1057
http://www.implosionworld.com/Article-WTC%20STUDY%208-06%20w%20clarif%20as%20of%209-8-06%20.pdf
http://www.ce.berkeley.edu/~astaneh/1-Services/Astaneh-Testimony%20Congress-March%206%20Final.pdf
http://911research.wtc7.net/cache/planes/defense/aviationnow_jumpstart.htm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/3919613.stm
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/02/25/attack/main501989.shtml
http://www.designnews.com/index.asp?layout=article&articleid=CA6363426&industryid=43653
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB196/doc04.pdf
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB196/doc08.pdf
http://s3.amazonaws.com/911timeline/2001/embryriddle092101.html
http://www.epa.gov/WTC/demolish_deconstruct/30wbroadway.htm
http://www.post-gazette.com/headlines/20010925scene0925p2.asp
http://www.firehouse.com/news/2002/7/7_P911.html
http://www.firehouse.com/terrorist/11_APdc.html
http://www.firehouse.com/terrorist/911/magazine/gz/norman.html
http://www.firehouse.com/terrorist/911/magazine/gz/boyle.html
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A28318-2005Apr5.html
http://www.post-gazette.com/headlines/20011220shanksville1220p2.asp
http://www.post-gazette.com/headlines/20010925sledzik0925p3.asp
http://www.post-gazette.com/headlines/20011028flt93mainstoryp7.asp
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,212800,00.html
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,34211,00.html
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/binladen/who/interview.html
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB196/index.htm
http://cryptome.sabotage.org/wtc-house.htm
http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/nyregion/20050812_WTC_GRAPHIC/Banaciski_Richard.txt
http://www.icivilengineer.com/News/WTC/Fire.html
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&node=&contentId=A13766-2001Sep11
http://enr.construction.com/news/buildings/archives/030127.asp
http://www.navytimes.com/story.php?f=1-292925-467181.php
http://news.uns.purdue.edu/html4ever/020910.Sozen.Pentagon.html
http://www.newhousenews.com/archive/story1a012802.html
http://web.archive.org/web/20040225213523/http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/nation/ny-usflight232380680sep23.story
http://www.metallurgy.nist.gov/techactv2005/ar2005_safety.html#fire
http://www.911myths.com/html/ntsb_release_august_22_2006.html
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/terrorism/jan-june02/towers_5-1.html
http://edition.cnn.com/2006/US/11/02/wtc.remains.reut/index.html
http://web.archive.org/web/20031026101720/http://www.arabianews.org/english/article.cfm?qid=12&sid=6
http://www.september11news.com/OsamaEvidence.htm
http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/nr/2001/skyscrapers.pdf
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&contentId=A19549-2001Sep24
http://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/M.A.Sweeney.html
http://www.guardian.co.uk/wtccrash/story/0%2C1300%2C550486%2C00.html
http://criticalthrash.com/terror.html
http://fire.nist.gov/bfrlpubs/build03/PDF/b03017.pdf
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2001/11/28/60II/main319383.shtml
2007-01-10 07:19:46 · answer #10 · answered by arus.geo 7 · 6⤊ 9⤋