2007-01-10 06:38:18 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
whew. It's a good thing President Bush did'nt overreact and start a war or anything.
2007-01-10 06:42:56 · update #1
Yeah, and just found out that bush is setting a new course
2007-01-10 06:43:35 · answer #1 · answered by AD 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
You know what's funny though? Instead of admitting that they made a mistake, they made 4 or 5 different excuses that were all full of **** to justify going over there. That gives the appearance that they were just looking for an excuse from day 1. Maybe if they just admitted it was a bad judgment call to invade a country so preemptively, people could have considered the President a somewhat responsible human being and trusted him with other matters. Sad that it went the other way. And not all news is lies, just Fox News. Actually, I believe PBS is fairly balanced and unbiased. It's clear that not 100% of what the right wing, nor the left wing does is right, but that right there is why Fox News looks like such a joke. They actually believe the right wing does no wrong.
2007-01-10 06:50:31 · answer #2 · answered by Just Another Godless Liberal lol 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
This a lower back-door liberal attempt to evade the structure by way of utilising the UN. (as if I care what the UN thinks). No, a handgun, rifle, or shotgun isn't a weapon of mass destruction, whoever got here up with it really is a moron yet liberals and morons have similar believes and intelligence degrees. it really is a fashion for libs to objective to bypass some type of gun administration without dealing with Congress. I say bypass it. It received't change some thing because maximum human beings do not care what the UN thinks. we could continuously withdraw besides.
2016-12-28 15:25:09 · answer #3 · answered by Erika 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You know what's interesting though: Many people complain that Bush controls the media and we are spoon fed lies. So the fact that there was no WMD, that isn't a lie? But wait, that doesn't help their case. Oh, so maybe they aren't always lying, hmmm..... But it would seem that in the sea of supposed lies we live in, that lying about WMD would be a given, right? I mean if the report came back that WMD was found, you'd all be saying that's a lie, right? But they told the truth, about something very important. Makes you wonder... I hope.
2007-01-10 06:45:28 · answer #4 · answered by Pfo 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Actually there were no STOCKPILES of WMD's, they did find over 500 shells containing chemical agents.
Even if there were no WMDs most of the world believed they were there and Saddam did nothing to dissuade this. All he would have had to do to avoid the war was to let the inspectors in without hindering them.
2007-01-10 06:44:37 · answer #5 · answered by Rorshach4u 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
did you hear the news in 06 that the military found 500 WMDs
2007-01-10 07:04:35 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Iraqi human bodies are weapons of mass destruction...
2007-01-10 06:44:50 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I saw the 'news' and I also saw a couple of the nerve-gas warheads we recovered.
Which should I believe? My own eyes or the 'spin' you put on the news?
2007-01-10 06:51:05 · answer #8 · answered by MikeGolf 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Really, so what did Saddam use on the Kurds ? And what was that the NYT of all papers was saying about 1yr. before Saddam was nuclear... Oh wait, do you not consider nuclear weapons and gases WMD...
2007-01-10 06:45:21 · answer #9 · answered by bereal1 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
No did you here the news where one of saddams homeys said they trucked um all over to syria?
2007-01-10 06:44:15 · answer #10 · answered by freestreams 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋