Iraq is now such a mess. Since American people have made two consequtive brilliant choices to elect Bush, should we elect him to become the next President of Iraq after his term is done, and see if he could do a better job than Hussein? Just to give him another chance....
2007-01-10 06:02:40 · 11 answers · asked by yunthetiger 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
He shouldn't be allowed to because he will mess things up even worse then he will be hanged for starting the whole Iraq mess. The only thing that united Iraqis now is their hatred of America, but who could blame them? This mess will take decades to clean up and more troops is NOT the answer. Hope the Democrats will stand up to him.
2007-01-10 06:08:50 · answer #1 · answered by Sir Alex Awesome Valentine, Esq. 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Your question gadgets up a straw argument. The vote to authorize replaced into completely criminal - whether you individually approve or not. All Barack Obama did replaced into supply a speech to three gathering of folk who additionally unfavorable the war. there replaced into no possibility in touch. He did not would desire to bypass on the checklist. His opinion replaced into in simple terms that - an opinion. in simple terms like the opinion of thousands and thousands of alternative human beings throughout our united states of america on the time of the run-as much as the war. we at the instant are not permitting them to run for president consistent with their critiques - the two for or against the authorization. simply by fact the time of Obama's speech he has had a blended checklist of balloting for and against authorization of investment to proceed the U. S. involvement in Iraq. this is annoying to tell the place he stands different than that he criticizes others who did take a stand on the checklist. We do understand whether that he replaced into needless to say incorrect with regard to the surge and he refuses to take duty for his needless to say defective judgment. Had he been commander in chief, Iraq could have sunk into chaos, the U. S. could have suffered extra casualties, the situation could have worsened, and we would desire to nor be seeing the more advantageous circumstances which at the instant are going to enable us to withdraw troops and shorten excursions of accountability. we will not enable a guy or woman who has so little understanding of militia and foreign places affairs to be our next president.
2016-10-30 13:20:04 · answer #2 · answered by lobos 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well I don't in anyway challenge your intelligence as I too am no a fan of mr bush. But you might have noticed you are not a Iraqi resident never mind a citizen. We don't vote in Irag.
2007-01-10 06:08:15 · answer #3 · answered by jgold49 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The people of Iraq have suffered enough already.
2007-01-10 06:25:43 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Since ALL of our money, time and troops are in Iraq were should go ahead and make it the 51st state.
2007-01-10 06:12:00 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well of course! Bush as president is always a great thing. No matter where he is president of.
BUSH RULES!!!!
2007-01-10 06:08:53 · answer #6 · answered by USMCstingray 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Haven't those poor Iraqi people suffered enough?
2007-01-10 06:07:12 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I NEVER voted for Bush;always for his opponent.Don't insult all of us here in the U.S.
2007-01-10 06:07:21 · answer #8 · answered by MaryBeth 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
some said he should continue to finish his job in Iraq
some said he should step down for prevent more problems
2007-01-10 06:11:06 · answer #9 · answered by ProxyP56434 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
nooooooooo wayyyyyyy!
2007-01-10 06:07:17 · answer #10 · answered by TaTa * 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋