Everyone knows that John wasn't into it anymore, but she gets so much grief. The evolution of his person is always blamed on her.
2007-01-10 05:55:37 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Music
I think it's sad, all she did was make John happy after being miserable for along time, he loved her very much and would have shunned these so-called beatles fans for putting his lady down like that. If anything I'd say paul broke up the beatles, but that's just my poinion.
2007-01-10 06:06:30 · answer #1 · answered by digby_by 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No. i do no longer blame Yoko in any respect. The Beatles have been already turning out to be and shifting in separate instructions till now Yoko got here onto the scene. They have been all drained and looking out into different pastimes in my opinion and professionally. the undeniable fact that John replaced into at his happiest whilst along with her replaced into beside the component. Yoko's very public presence and the known public's known dislike of her made it hassle-free for all responsible Yoko. i think of they have been already headed for a spoil. Yoko purely provided a handy excuse for that's occurring.
2016-10-06 23:03:40 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yoko is Satan's little sister. She turned John away from his focus on music. SHE IS TO BLAME!!!
2007-01-10 06:31:37 · answer #3 · answered by Mangy Coyote 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sorry, not trying to be mean or anything, but it was all her fault. Yes, John and Paul would argue, but before Yoko, they were always able to work it out. I blame her solely.
2007-01-10 07:14:34 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Hey Sugar, it was her fault and she should be banned from life.
And i did mean from life not for life.
Have a nice day.
2007-01-10 06:00:24 · answer #5 · answered by Ringo 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
yeah...folks luved john too much to blame him
2007-01-10 06:00:00 · answer #6 · answered by ♥mee mee♥ 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Nope can't say that I feel bad because of this.
2007-01-10 06:02:02 · answer #7 · answered by Callie 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋