Is it because Bill Clinton got a BJ or is it because Ted Kennedy is a drunk?
2007-01-10 05:17:29 · 16 answers · asked by DoucheRider 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
It's because Clinton was too busy with Monica to take Bin Laden on a silver platter when Sudan offered him. Instead of admitting that the groundwork to the 9/11 attacks was laid in the Clinton administration the Dem's want to be able to blame it all on Bush. By defeating the terrorist regime he is creating terrorism, they say. Let's just be glad that Bush and not Gore was in office on 09-11-01.
2007-01-10 05:28:37 · answer #1 · answered by cornbread 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
the Terror Attacks of 911 was an inside job...
It's impossible for a fire to melt steel unless it is assisted by something like "oxygen/acetylene" Jet fuel or Kerosene does not burn hot enough to melt steel...look at the periodic table of elements. Also if the floors where the planes hit collapsed causing a chain reaction it would have taken well over 50 seconds for the buildings to come down. They came down at free fall speed....9 seconds. There is no logical argument here. Explosives were pre-planted in the building. Case closed! Why are so many people having a hard time accepting this? George Bush President of the United States is a man who has flushed all honor and integrity down the toilet. He has spread shame on America, it's Constitution, and it's People. It is a highly embarrassing situation for every Good American. This Man has spun completely out of control and he needs to be stopped immediately. President Bush has discounted himself to nothing more then a mere "War Criminal."
2007-01-10 13:27:54 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why would we want to be attacked by terrorists, we already have fascists in power. And for Billy getting a BJ, I say way to go. He wasn't the first and sure wasn't the last, sure she was a little hefty but come'on, he's fifty something. Unless your the Donald, you just don't get the supermodels at that age. As for Teddy, well, there really isn't an excuse for that guy except he is good at his job, maybe he is a functional drunk.
Maybe we want to be attacked be Yorkshire Terrierists. Yip yip, bad dog.
2007-01-10 13:27:40 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Looks like it is Bush who wants us to be attacked.
what did Bus do?
Backed off Clinton administration's anti-terrorism efforts.
Shelved the Hart-Rudman report.
Appointed new anti-terrorism task force under Dick Cheney. Group did not even meet before 9/11.
Called for cuts in anti-terrorism efforts by the Department of Defense.
Gave no priority to anti-terrorism efforts by Justice Department.
Ignored warnings from Sandy Berger, Louis Freeh, George Tennant, Paul Bremer, and Richard Clarke about the urgency of terrorist threats.
Halted Predator drone tracking of Osama bin Laden.
Did nothing in wake of August 6 C.I.A. report to president saying Al Qaeda attack by hijack of an airliner almost certain.
Bush - knowing about the terrorists' plans to attack in America, warned that terrorists were in flight schools in the US - took a four week vacation.
2007-01-10 13:24:21 · answer #4 · answered by truth seeker 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Both happened, and don't forget Clinton - - "didn't inhale." - - But didn't Bush get drunk too? Didn't he even skip out a bit on his military service?
Of course libs don't want to be attacked by terrorists, they don't want their own country to spy on them either!
Maybe I understand why you are a top contender for dumbest poster on another question..........
2007-01-10 13:24:22 · answer #5 · answered by Joy K 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Please try and state your question in a manner that will not just illicit insults.
Liberals do not want terrorist to attacks us, it is just that their philosophy is misguided and they might not be aware that their methods will do us harm in the long run.
Just like some parents that do not discipline their children they don't believe their method is doing any harm, but what happens is that as they become adults society ends up disciplining them it is called PRISON.
2007-01-10 13:32:08 · answer #6 · answered by Ynot! 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
For the tenth time today, Iraq and terror are not the same war, and liberals don't want any terrorism here, even domestic terrorists.
2007-01-10 13:24:58 · answer #7 · answered by vertical732 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
SSDD
another post, like the 250 that have already been on here today. can you really not come up with anything different?
2007-01-10 13:26:13 · answer #8 · answered by 2010 CWS Champs! 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because they hate America as
much as terrorists do.
2007-01-10 13:33:34 · answer #9 · answered by PokerChip 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It will make Bush look bad.
That is what they want pure and simple start with that in mind you can understand the liberals and the DNC.
2007-01-10 13:23:54 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋