How could the collapes of the World Trade Centers defy the laws of Physics?

Question

It's impossible for a fire to melt steel unless it is assisted by something like "oxygen/acetylene" Jet fuel or Kerosene does not burn hot enough to melt steel...look at the periodic table of elements. Also if the floors where the planes hit collapsed causing a chain reaction it would have taken well over 50 seconds for the buildings to come down. They came down at free fall speed....9 seconds. There is no logical argument here.
Explosives were preplanted in the building. Case closed! Why are so many people having a hard time accepting this?

http://patriotsquestion911.com/
911 TRUTH.ORG
REOPEN 911.ORG
PUBLIC ACTION.COM
SERENDIPITY.LI
APFN.ORG
911 ATTACK ON AMERICA.COM
INFOWARS.COM
TRUTHMOVE.ORG
FREE PRESS INTERNATIONAL.COM
ABLE DANGER.COM
911STUFF.COM

Answer 1

The laws of physics and the basics of most science fall on deaf ears among conservative circles. They would rather live in a bubbly illusion that their government always looks out for their best interests, that the GOP is full of Godly men who would never undermine this country for self-interest, and that any scientific evidence that contravenes this perception is obviously left wing propaganda. Come on now, these are the same people that would rather believe that an allegory like the book of Genesis reflects more scientific fact, than the mountain of evidence that substantiates evolutionary theory. Rational argument is an exercise in futility for those who come to their worldview out of emotive reasons.

Answer 2

People have a hard time accepting the idea of explosives being pre-planted in the building because it would take thousands of pounds of explosives in each building. Those explosives would had to have been installed at night when no one was there so the individual tenants burglar alarms would have been bypassed.

To place the explosive on the columns and floor clips would have meant removing sheet rock and replacing them before the tenants returned in the morning. It would have rewired moving desks and other office furniture and returning them to exactly the same location. It would have required lifting ceiling tiles and working in the drop ceilings without making a mess.

It would have taken months to do each building, and all that time building maintenance people wouldn't have seen anything. It would have been a risky proposition. And that doesn't account for the 24/7 tenants of the building; how would the explosives be planted in their areas of the buildings?

But the main reason the truth is that two planes hit the towers is that anyone who understands physics knows the steel doesn't have to vaporize to make the buildings collapse, just soften enough to affect the structural integrity, which would happen around 1200 degrees Fahrenheit, below the burning temperature of jet fuel.

Answer 3

Most people who do not agree with you are the same people who believe everything that was told to them in the media. I agree with you 100%. You are right, there is so damn much more.

Bush just happened to be having a meeting the morning of 9-11 in which one of the attendees was OBL's brother. Hey, meetings happen all the time, right?

Jebbie was on the ball, quickly confiscating the records from the pilot school, thank God he was on the job!

Our brave war president was so right to fight any investigation into 9-11 tooth and nail, why throw good money after bad? As it is, he only spent $11 mill. Now, if he were investigating consentual sex between adults, that would have justified $90 mill.

Also how about adding the coincidence that 3 of the hijackers lived at Pensacola Naval Base?

Answer 4

Steel doesn't have to "melt" from heat for a collapse. It only has to reach it's yield point. The point at which it softens enough so's not to be able to support the loads placed upon it.

You obviously know nothing about structural engineering and construction.

"Explosives were preplanted in the building. Case closed! Why are so many people having a hard time accepting this? "

So a few thousand employees stood by for months as their offices were torn apart and tons of explosives and miles of wiring were attached directly to structural framing members. They said nothing and then went to work on 9/11 so they could be blown up? And nobody has ever spilled the beans since?

Get help!

Answer 5

So there isn't any oxygen at 900 feet? I guess you have never heard of the Bessemer process that is used to melt steel? Listen up child...There is a reason that skyscrapers have "revolving" doors at their base. It is to prevent the rush of cool air at the base from rising to the top at high speed. Now, throw a big fire at the top of a building, and open the base of the building to allow people to get out. The fire will draw air from the base thus increasing the fires temperature. Now, also add in all the synthetic materials that burn at 2000 plus degrees, now you have more than enough heat to melt steel. Oh wait, you don't have to 'melt' steel to make it bend...just heat it up enough. Maybe you should go visit a blacksmith and see just how you make steel pliable. Instead of sitting on you butt and throwing out baseless lies to try to hurt the Nation. You are a fool and a disgrace. Not only would calling you a retard be an an insult to retarded people, but you and all of your fellow conspiracy theorists are traitors, and should be lined up and slapped, or worse.

Answer 6

That doesn't make any sense. But a few points...

I am no engineer I saw it come down and I am pretty sure we would have seen explosives. Also, why a controlled detination instead of letting it collapse sideways into the rest of Manhatten.
The weight of the floors above the impact site (which was larger than one floor) fell first. Perhaps the building was designed to collapse that way instead of toppling over in the rest of the city?

The ancient peoples of Scotland used to make forts by melting rocks... Surely, with all the paper and combustables in the building, a fuel laden plane could get hot enough to melt steel (it had been burning for over a half an hour.) If people can melt rocks with wood and grass...

Nice try...

Answer 7

All I know is that at some temperature steel melts. Originally I come from a steel town and I've seen the hot metal melted in big vats by fire and then they pour it out into forms to make steel.

It was said that the fire was hot enough to make the steel bend, and the bending made the towers come down. I believe that. Anyway a lot of our steel making has gone overseas now, and who knows what additives they are including when they make the steel.

Answer 8

How does any development come down in this is very own "footprint"? thankfully, it replaced into evacuated first. this manner of super form of questions, lots power spent production solutions; while basic experience reasons "combat or flight" reaction, actuality would desire to be particularly unnerving. The air at floor 0 is risk-free, we fee existence, we honor the rescuers......who says those issues, in contempt?

Answer 9

The tower lost structural support and gravity did the rest. It was not nessasary to melt steel, it needed just enough to weaken.

Answer 10

This is a list of web sites to stay away from, their CRAZZZZY. When you become an architect, consider this question again and you'll understand how ridiculas it is and you can move on to something else to fall apart over.