Do u Think Bush HAS RIGHT TO Enter IRAQ and Fight ?

Question

War in Iraq

Answer 1

do i have the right to enter your house and fight you (or more accurately, you and all of your family, including grandparents and any visitors)?

NO

Answer 2

I am not sure if we were right to go into Iraq. I know that Saddam was an evil man and taking him out was right. I know that his sons were just as evil as he was and that taking them out was right. Did he have WMD at the time of the invasion it doesn't look like he had recent weapons but he could have shipped them out to Libya or Syria when he knew we were coming. But that is neither here nor there, what matters is that we are there now. Now we need to stay and finish what we have started and if that means putting more troops on the ground than that is what we must do. A war cannot be run by congress it must be run by the generals who are actually on the scene. Can you imagine having 535 bosses and with no agreement between them on what you should do? I can it was called Vietnam. You do remember how that ended do you not.

Answer 3

The "Bush Doctrine" is certainly new but interventionalist doctrines are hardly unheard of in US history, and not without provocation. Whether 9/11 is adequate justification is open to argument, but I think it's not really valid to use current operational difficulties as an argument against the overall long-range grand strategy. Logical arguments seem hard to come by since your average guy doesn't have a good sense of history or a real understanding, for that matter, of the difference between strategy and tactics.

Answer 4

I'm not sure it matters... Bush will never ask for the right to enter Iraq and fight. He will simply continue to demand the right to send the children of lower-income families to fight for him.

Answer 5

It's a bit late to be asking this question, he did this nearly four years ago.

According to international law he did not have a right to attack Iraq and his war was neither allowed or supported by the United Nations. The war is illegal and nobody simply has a 'right' to invade another country in order to steal their resources.

Answer 6

Congress approved the war. The evidence ended up being less than accurate. Both Democratic and Republican Congressional leaders voted in favor of the action based on the same evidence the President was given. Those are the facts. Yes, he had the legal permission of Congress.

Answer 7

These answers tell me that you people are even worse than plain imbeciles... First of all, you do not have any real power. This is evidenced from your cowardice -- you can only bully the weak! Taking candy from a child is not that difficult, and I don't know why you are so proud of your shameful and outright criminal actions. But it's pointless to tell you this because you are blinded by your greed and delusions of grandeur. Continue doing this and you're doomed... Take my word for it...

Answer 8

No he does not because he did not consult the un..which is normal procedure plus the war in iraq is based on false pretenses because saddam has no wmds..were over there for the oil. Check out this website http://nationalpriorities.org/index.php?option=com_wrapper&Itemid=182 and antiwar.com.

Answer 9

No, you see what he has caused over 3,000 dead troops, thousand maimed . What good has this war done, no weapons of mass destruction, no nothing but a President that doesn't know what is doing, he said he knew where the weapons were, he cold go there and lay his hand right on them.. All I seen him pickup was the drapes in his office looking underneath them saying, "Where are they, they have to be here somewhere". DUH!!!

Answer 10

Yah I would like to see him enter Iraq without the cover of darkness.
He could put his little flight suit from his mission accomplished phot op to good use finally.

Answer 11

My understanding is : this is the first time america has invaded a soverign country. That is wrong. We shoud have invaded Sudi Araba, thats were most all the 911 hijackers were from.