Senator Ted Kennedy calls for the recognition of the intelligence behind a Universal Health Care Plan?

Question

it is definitely a wiser and humane choice in cutting, not creating waste, while at the same time providing good coverage for all?

I forgot to make this a question, so will only think to add to this post, what can you economically or rationally decline this measure of wish with? Please do your homework or know the answers if you wish an intelligent response?

Bill W- Helping all people with affordable and effective health-care can be labeled any way you wish, but in a logical macro-economic view of it, it seems to fit the label of more fair, feasible and economically sound and democratic that communistic.

My opinion based on macro-economics in this issue should be taken into consideration with my answer to someones question regarding immigration, where I added the slumping housing market into the argument as well, which provided some hopefully with the economic sense that where more people benefit, more people benefit. I wider provision of health-care would cause a wider cause of debt-reduction by reducing risinf health-care costs, and debts from hospitals, allowing not only more money into the economy, which not only forces greater prosperity and less taxes, but also then eventually lowers the cost of this health-care itself.

p.s. prosperity leads to more competition, therefore it is obvious, more people with money from this prosperity, able to take advantage of innovation.

Answer 1

Well, this is not history.
Might want to post this in the politics and Gov't section.

Answer 2

Universal Health Care is a stupid liberal/communist idea.

I am in Canada with extreme taxes, and lazy, unhealthy people get free health care with the taxes of hard-working, healthy people (and they even show up in ER when they get the sniffles).

There are long lineups for ER, and many have died waiting there. Many more have died waiting for lifesaving surgery.

Bring on Private Health Care. It promotes healthy competition and innovation in health care.

Answer 3

It might still be a good idea even though that fat fraud is behind it.