English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Should women become mothers after age 40? I am 39 and will be 40 later on this year. I have no children and people keep asking me when will I have children. To be honest, I really don't want any and I think after 40 is a little too old to try to become a mom. Besides the rate of complications and birth defects become higher during pregnancy. What are your opinions?

2007-01-10 03:50:01 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Pregnancy & Parenting Pregnancy

17 answers

If your life has put you in the position that you were married later in life and now desire a family and you are 40 then I think it is fine. I have a good friend that had 2 kids later in life, one at 39 and the other at 41 and both are healthy and beautiful. I had my first at 33 and we are trying for another and I am 36. There are pros and cons to being an older mom, but there are also pros and cons for being a young mom. I say, if it will make you happy, DO IT! If you don't want kids that is fine too. Don't be pressured into it by someone else. Kids are a LOT of work and a 24/7 job, you really need to love it or you will be miserable.

2007-01-10 03:59:50 · answer #1 · answered by mom-knows-best 3 · 0 0

Well it sounds like you are thinking about having a child or you wouldn't of wrote to yahoo answers. So I say go for it, if you really want one. Look at the lady who just had a baby at the age 60 and she was fine. I think that is a little too old. I don't really no much I am 25 years old and I still don't have children, everybody says when am I going to have one and I say never. Expessially right now, I mean I am a full time student and have a part-time job. So see I could be the age 40 before I have a child to. So good luck. Make your decision soon though you don't want to be 60 and having a child.

2007-01-10 04:04:01 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

i think it is up to the woman in question. i had my first child at age 38. i turned 39 this last september, and if we want to have another child, it will have to be after i turn 40. we are still discussing this, but not really from the age standpoint (mostly it is a financial decision for our family). my husband is 42, and would be 43 before the next child is born... it is really up to you, and whether you have any children or not is none of anyone else's business. when they ask you when you will have children, ask them "why do you ask?" this forces them to say something about your age, and if they actually do - let them know how tactless and insulting that is. eventually, they may get the point...

2007-01-10 04:05:00 · answer #3 · answered by SmartAleck 5 · 0 0

If you don't want any, then don't have them. I personally would not have a child at the age of 40 (planned) but if i did get pregnant i would have it. I worked with a woman that did not start having children until she was 40 and she absolutely loved it she said she got to have her young years to herself and travel with her husband then start having children and she believed it made her relationship better. you have to take your health into consideration as well I know that at 58 when the kid graduates you wont be old but you'll be getting up there and anything could happen. good luck on your decision, remember it is your decision.

2007-01-10 03:59:02 · answer #4 · answered by jgurl1979 2 · 0 0

Motherhood is wonderful but you must be 100% sure, especially at this age as it is extremely draining physically and mentally to raise a baby. The body knows that the remaining number of eggs you have are not of good quality. That is why it is harder to conceive as you get older and birth defects are a big risk. I would talk to your OB/GYN since they have experience with women who have had children later in life and can help you make a decision. Good luck!

2007-01-10 03:58:49 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Being professional-determination, and believing that a woman has administration over her determination to stay pregnant, i may well be a hypocrite if i did no longer additionally say that she has administration over her reproductive expertise. it relatively is a scientific and straight forward rights answer. yet i'm additionally a pragmatist, and socially, i'm a sprint severe of the full thought. and not for the statistical reasons you state, as i've got faith that if a ascertain (guardian) is a competent one, with the final suited help shape, they are in a position to enhance super infants. yet i'm involved interior the monetary build of the region. of course, if a woman can arise with the money for the overwhelmingly severe value of having a new child, then she ought to have a brilliant job. And if thats the case, what hours does she artwork? who is going to be elevating that new child? In my 1920s, I had desperate that if I wasn't married with tips from 35, i wanted to have a new child on my own. properly, 35 arrived, and that i found out that i did no longer have the money or the emotional skill to enhance a new child on my own. as much as i might have enjoyed a new child at that component, i actually felt that it could have been an irresponsible and egocentric determination for me to make. particular, I surely have the final suited to have a new child biologically, yet do I surely have the ethical and to blame precise to have one if i'm no longer able to provide them each and every thing they choose in terms of time and dedication?

2016-10-06 22:55:42 · answer #6 · answered by banowski 4 · 0 0

If you don't want a baby, don't have one, but age shouldn't be why you say no. There is so much technology these days that it hardly matters. My mom had her youngest at 39 or 40, I can't remember and he's fine, except maybe a little wild! ;)

2007-01-10 03:54:20 · answer #7 · answered by accent_01 2 · 0 0

If you don't want any then don't have any!
Nowadays it seems women are having children later and later, and with medicine the way it is, the risks are lower and easier to treat if the child does have problems.
Tell those who nag you to back off, we don't all need to have children. You can lead a fulfilled life without them...

2007-01-10 03:55:21 · answer #8 · answered by aliaspice 2 · 0 0

The risks do get a little highter but many women have perfectly healthy babies after 40. If you dont a child then dont have one.

2007-01-10 03:56:45 · answer #9 · answered by KathyS 7 · 0 0

1

2017-03-02 05:05:50 · answer #10 · answered by Baldwin 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers