How do NeoConservative Christians explain the grotesque hypocrisy of George W Bush's claim to be a "born-again" Christian, a follower of Jesus Christ, (who loved mankind so much he wouldn't lift a finger to defend himself from even the most unscrupulous and ignoble of deaths), with his preemptive war on a supposedly sovereign, third world nation that has resulted in the death of over 600,000 men, women, and children?
Isn't one of the Ten Commandments "Thou shalt not kill"? Do NeoCons actually think Jesus would ignore his own personal values, let alone his "commandments," under the ruse of "national security"?
2007-01-10 03:19:51 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
TurboDweeBie: Only intellectual cowards use plural pronouns to express their personal point of view; but thanks for demonstrating that you're the one with the "least clue of what you're talking about."
2007-01-10 03:49:42 · update #1
Thegustaffa-duh:
Only unthinking fools believes that an "all-loving God" would ever "sanction" the killing of innocent men, women, and children.
The "fear of hypocrisy"?? As a Bible fetishist, you have thrown your discernment out with the slop.
2007-01-10 04:06:10 · update #2
We know what the Bible says, and don't need some screeching unknowledgeable preener to tell us what Christianity means.
Let's just say that you haven't the least clue what you're talking about.
------
Well, you go and insult me (pathetic, funning with my avatar name - ooooh), and still can't manage to prove you've the least clue what you're talking about. Nor have you the wit or the proof to castigate me.
Actually, people like me who know religion know that the correct translation of the original was "Thou Shalt Not Murder". You prove your ignorance at every step.
Why must asshats like you feel the need to prove your ignorance and lack of character repeatedly to the whole world?
2007-01-10 03:35:40 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes, the bible does say thou shalt not kill. However, the bible is riddled with stories of great battles sanctioned by god, and don't forget the story of the first born.
Yes, the bible says "thou shalt not kill" but it also advocates justice and punishment. If Saddam had followed the word of the bible, he would not have been subjected to punishment. We cannot, as a nation, be captivated by the fear of hypocrisy. Believing in Jesus doesn't mean that you have to shirk the responsibility of protecting your citizens, and make no mistake, we have been under attack by terrorists for the last 20 years. Moreover, you are not being forced to fight, so why do you care?
2007-01-10 03:38:39 · answer #2 · answered by Thegustaffa 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
they imagine it would want to help you them win elections. won't be able to say it more effective useful than this guy: "the inducement ..... to inform such obtrusive lies is easy. they're attempting to reclaim the submit 9/11 “glory days” of the Republican social gathering. the objective is to cajole the yankee those that for the duration of consumer-friendly words Republicans can keep them chance-free, or maybe as a historic reality like the date of 9/11 annoying circumstances their claims, then they rewrite historic previous to blame bill Clinton for 9/11. The Republicans are nonetheless treating the yankee human beings like they're finished idiots. all of us is conventional with that Bush become president for the duration of 9/11. Their pathetic attempt to regulate the info could be an insult to each American. This modern large lie of the right is a shallow attempt to revive the politics of worry that carried the GOP to victory in 2002 and 2004." Jason Easley EdIt: and then they lie about saying there have been no attacks. Bush Press Secretary Dana Perino it stated very last November. Rudy Guiliani stated it very last Friday on ABC information. Mary Matalin stated it on Sunday. analyzing the righties spinning this can be humorous if it wasn't so pathetic. No none of those human beings stated "after 9/11". Guiliani stated that the underpants bomber become an act of kinfolk terrorism, meaning on American soil or in American airspace. you will see that any of those on video. and they say liberals have a project with info! The costs were no longer taken out of context. seem on the video clips!
2016-12-28 15:07:02 · answer #3 · answered by lopes 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You should abandon the use of the term "Neocon" to describe right-wingers in general. A Neocon is a member of a now-defunct movment that believed in aggressive and unilateral use of US power internationally. They were mostly Jewish. Religious Right reactionaries are not the same thing as Neocons.
2007-01-10 03:39:04 · answer #4 · answered by Yahoo Will Never Silence Me 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
George Bush is a globalist. He is playing by the globalist play book just like Clinton and George Bush part 1. His religion isn't a factor in his bad decisions.
2007-01-10 04:13:00 · answer #5 · answered by coolforbeer 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They can't.
They use the farce of religion to justify their xenophobia and hatred, just like the Islamic extremists do.
2007-01-10 03:22:18 · answer #6 · answered by Ben Aqui 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
George is in direct contact with our lord and savior; don't presume to know what the voices are saying.
2007-01-10 03:23:20 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
They can't & Bush is a big phony & I wish more people would figure that out.
2007-01-10 03:23:21 · answer #8 · answered by day by day 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
the Bible is not against justified war.
2007-01-10 03:37:35 · answer #9 · answered by L. 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋