To what extent should the government be responsible for the welfare and security of an individual?

Answer 1

To the extent that the person cannot reasonably do it for himself.

We have armies and police forces because the individual can't always protect himself properly. We have fire departments and health departments for similar reasons. We build public roads because the individual can't afford to. We have public schools because they are far cheaper than having to hire private tutors.

The government should provide medical care and financial support for those who (being here legally!) cannot be expected to work productively, such as the disabled, the elderly, and in many cases single parents with children. If you don't you have problems with crime, starvation, a large homeless population, disease, etc. Private charities simply can't cope with such needs without government assistance. If you don't have such programs, you save money but then your country starts to look like a ghetto or like the poorer countries of Africa.

We could easily afford social security and medicare if it weren't also for the fact that a huge part of our national budget (25% or more) goes to pay interest on the budget deficits of past years.

Answer 2

nicely, the extra advantageous the government responsibilty for guy or woman welfare the fewer freedom. i desire to be as loose as attainable so I say no responsiblity. the everyday welfare clause interior the constitituion does not have something to do with "welfare for human beings". It replaced into precisely the different. the government replaced into authorised to spend money purely to advance the everyday welfare, which potential placed money into issues that could nicely be utilized by potential of all electorate. If the government spends money to feed a undeniable guy or woman, the the remainder of the everyday inhabitants is denied get entry to to that government spending and it violates the form.

Answer 3

I think we need national helath care, social security, regulations and money for public institutions (schools, programs, ect)
I support welfare with limitations.

I also think there has to be something in place to stop the rising levels of homelessness. its so easy for people to miss one check and be on the streets or in shelters (I think shelters can be either government or privatly funded)

I also think the nation and the government has a responcibility to those who can't help them selves - children, mentally disabled/challeged,ect

Answer 4

That is a great question and I wish they would keep their nose out of my personal life style and quit being a parent to us and run the government and I can not see they are doing too good a job there either,

Answer 5

As little as possible. The more controls you give the Government the less freedoms you hold.

Answer 6

Depends on whether we are a "Christian" nation or not.

Answer 7

none