We input his name along with the following modifiers in a leading Search Engine. Here are the results"
"George W. Bush" + "liar" = 967.000 hits
" + "idiot" = 642,000 hits
" + "moron" = 715,000 hits
" + "lunatic" = 319,000 hits
" + "menace" = 795,000 hits
" + "failure" = 1,520,000 hits
" + "disaster" = 1,200,000 hits
" + the worst" = 1,180,000 hits
Also, if you specify the top hit only for him and "failure", you are connected to the OFFICIAL White House Biography of George W. Bush. How appropriate!
2007-01-10
02:44:11
·
14 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
Look up google bombing:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_bomb
Thanks to bringing this deceptive practice to people's attention, so that they are aware when they are being scammed. Some people have LOTS of free time . . .
:)
2007-01-10 02:52:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by American citizen and taxpayer 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ha
Do you have the courage to examine the ultimate verdict on you Liberals?
We input liberal along with the following modifiers in a leading Search Engine. Here are the results"
Liberal" + "liar" = 1,170.000 hits
" + "idiot" = 1,400,000 hits
" + "moron" = 1,100,000 hits
" + "lunatic" = 976,000 hits
" + "menace" = 1,320,000 hits
" + "failure" = 4,920,000 hits "WOW LOOK AT THIS NUMBER"
" + "disaster" = 1,360,000 hits
" + the worst" = 1,680,000 hits
2007-01-10 02:53:22
·
answer #2
·
answered by Noka 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I do not like George Bush but this is a very poor bit of research. How many hits did you get when you put in complimentary terms? If any scientist presented this as a research paper he would be laughed at. I gather you are in first grade to think this proves anything.
2007-01-10 02:50:10
·
answer #3
·
answered by Elizabeth Howard 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
Bill Clinton + liar = 1,080,000 hits
+ idiot = 1,160,000 hits
+ moron = 857,000 hits
+ lunatic =487,000 hits
+ menace = 796,000 hits
+ failure = 1, 280,000 hits
+ disaster = 1,270,000 hits
+ the worst = 1,330,000 hits
2007-01-10 03:02:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
I'm not a fan of Bush but the search engine results are too easily manipulated to mean much.
2007-01-10 02:53:42
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think that is called the fallacy of the masses and it is not a valid argument point. Just because hundreds of 1,000s of 'hits' on goolge search do not constitute the 'final verdict'.
Regardless of what you have been taught, 62,500 repetitions (or any for that amount) DO NOT equal a truth.
Smoke some more Soma, though, and feel good about yourself.
2007-01-10 02:50:52
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Gosh, I had no ideal "hits" on a search engine was the ultimate verdict. Huh, and all along I though that was God's job.
2007-01-10 02:49:56
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
No. He has led us right into a pointless war with the standard objective of controlling between the biggest oil fields interior the international. He has denied the existence of world warming simply by fact it did not extra healthful his desires. Now, he's a proponent of world warming simply by fact it suits his cutting-edge schedule. He does not sign the cluster bomb non-proliferation treaty simply by fact it may harm those industries production them in this united states of america. He claims to be a born back Christian yet he's professional-war. He claims to have under no circumstances made a mistake throughout his administration. in simple terms as I voted for him simply by fact he's professional-existence, i will additionally vote for McCain simply by fact the Democrats have offered their collective soul to the father of lies who tells them that abortion isn't homicide, that war is justified and stem cellular study isn't in simple terms yet another occasion of the collective slaughter of unborn, yet potential lives.
2016-10-30 12:55:05
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not with your allegations. You have already convicted him based on your personal feelings. He hasn't been accused of anything, by a legal court of law, and is innocent until proven guilty. Maybe you should live in an unjust country, since you are unjust.
2007-01-10 02:51:53
·
answer #9
·
answered by xenypoo 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
The only thing it reaffirm to me is that liberals are usually the most obnoxious no class loudmouths out there, so in actuality I am surprise! I thought it would be more.
Touche! nonalcholic facts are such a neat thing huh
2007-01-10 02:50:32
·
answer #10
·
answered by Ynot! 6
·
3⤊
1⤋