Is this an example of forced evolution?

Question

I read an article about how a harmless strain of the bactierium Vibrio cholerae was forceably changed by a bacteriophage to a become highly virulent one that causes cholera.

Is this an example of forced evolution?

Novengelis - So it's kinda like inter-kingdom breeding? (with no child obviously)

What are some other examples?

I actually meant forced evolution in the sense that the bacteria was genetically modified by the virus and gained additional abilities/properties.

Answer 1

It really isn't a good example of horizontal transfer (in this case the phage maintains its identity as a distinct biological entity, it's more parasitism actually). It definitely isn't coevolution. Coevolution is the evolution of two organisms in direct response to the selection pressures they place on each other.

I'm really not sure what forced evolution is, I don't think it's a scientifically accepted term. I would suspect it refers to evolution in response to a drastic artificial selection event caused by humans. For example, SARS, where a virus of civet cat jumps hosts because humans have all but wiped out the natural host.

Answer 2

That's horizontal transmission of genes (tranfer to a non-descendant) and bacterial / bacteriophage coevolution. The virus progegates itself by giving the bacterium a survival advantage. There are numerous examples.

Answer 3

NO HUMAN witnessed the establishing of lifestyles on the planet. - Yet you INSIST that the biblical variation of the establishing of the earth is truly. Nor has any person visible one sort of lifestyles evolve into a further sort—a reptile right into a mammal, for illustration. - Define "sort". Scientists have documented one species changing into a further species however is that your "sort" and they've verified the transition extra dramatically with forensics and fossils. Therefore, we ought to depend at the to be had proof to attract conclusions approximately the starting place of lifestyles. - Which is what we do however you depend on a verified fairy story as your proof. And we have to permit the proof talk for itself as an alternative than drive it to mention what we desire it to mention. - and that's EXACTLY what technology does. Many atheists, nonetheless, view technology via the lens of materialism—a philosophy that assumes only fabric motives for the starting place of lifestyles - No it PROVES a fabric reason of lifestyles. You have not begun to turn out magic exists so there is not any different alternative. “That materialism is absolute, for we can't enable a Divine Foot within the door.” - You ought to turn out a "divine foot" exists earlier than you'll characteristic strategies to it, now not the opposite direction round that is what you're seeking to do. a million) That isn't a "someway" it's been verified on many stages. two) It handiest takes 1800 molecules to make a self replicating RNA molecule. As an smug fundie you believe it was once a few hoe statistically inconceivable for it to create a human, however then you definitely believe individuals have been its ideal goal. No, lifestyles was once the ideal goal and we individuals lucked out. How did the molecules of lifestyles kind and obtain their mighty competencies with out an clever dressmaker? - Read a few precise technology and realize that. It has been verified on practically all stages. Evolutionary study fails to furnish sufficient factors or gratifying solutions to questions approximately the starting place of lifestyles - Because evolution has NOTHING to do with the origins of lifestyles. Evolution is difference through the years, not anything else. You have to learn a few learn technology as an alternative than fundie captions or Ben Stein. In final result, individuals who deny the functional intervention of a Creator characteristic godlike powers to senseless molecules and traditional forces. - No, You paradigm dictates that there's a supernatural intervention so your end mirrors your pre-end. Very fundie of you, however now not rational, logical or medical. What, even though, do the tips point out? The to be had proof indicates that alternatively of molecules establishing into difficult lifestyles-types, the reverse is correct: - That is in which you have to quit studying fundie captions and begin studying anything clever. That has already been verified. Physical legislation dictate that difficult matters—machines, residences, or even dwelling cells—in time holiday down. - And right here we're with the fundie variation of the 2d legislation of thermodynamics. Read the moment part of the legislation in which it offers with open procedures. Yet, evolutionists say the reverse can occur. - In an open procedure that's EXACTLY what occurs. That vigor, nonetheless, should be cautiously managed and accurately directed considering out of control vigor is much more likely to accelerate decay, simply because the vigor from the solar and the elements can hasten the deterioration of a constructing - You are attaining into the absurdity right here. You believe the whole lot was once EXACTLY created for you and that's the fundie conceitedness. Life exists below stipulations you take into account inconceivable or no less than inconceivable for YOU to exist. That is the fundie conceitedness that each one of this was once made for you. Those who think in evolution can't satisfactorily give an explanation for how vigor is creatively directed. - Because that's your pre-conclusive paradigm. It is NOT "creatively" directed, it exists, not anything extra.