English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

3 answers

I would follow the four steps of the scientific method, and
comment on how well each step was executed.

Did the project clearly define the problem and the hypothesis?
Was the approach to proof sound or did it have flaws (i.e., could the evidence provided still be interpreted to prove something else, or could other factors have caused the outcome besides what was attributed?) Was the research thorough, was it presented in an organized or haphazard manner? Was the conclusion clear and consistent, was it presented well?

Overall, I would look at both the technical points (i.e., the planning that went into it), the execution (how it was carried out), and the final presentation (was it clear and comprehensive or sloppy and poorly written or documented, organized or disorganized).

2007-01-10 03:06:46 · answer #1 · answered by emilynghiem 5 · 0 0

Depends on what kind of research project. Usually evaluation criteria is set by the people evaluating the specific project.

2007-01-10 01:53:48 · answer #2 · answered by What, what, what?? 6 · 0 0

while you're speaking approximately inventory marketplace examine the main significant standards is the certainly overall performance of the pronounced inventory which you will purely evaluate after a definite time. you ought to stick to the concepts of an analyst on paper first; if he replaced into precise interior the previous he or she will maximum probable be precise interior the destiny.

2016-10-06 22:49:56 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers