on the number of children that the government should pay for if you're on benefits?
2007-01-10 01:05:16 · 7 answers · asked by scotgal 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Yes, you should only get the benefits that you are entitled to when you first sign on, If you have or want any more children then get your fat *** out working to pay for them.
Why should the rest of us pay for them to sit at home to have children.
I also think that people that have more than one child or have another child with the same partner while on benefits should not be classes as a single parent even if living alone, They only say they are single to get more money.
I have always worked since I left school and only started a family when I could afford it, why should I expect society to pay for the upbringing of my child when I could do it myself.
2007-01-10 01:25:53 · answer #1 · answered by Kilted One 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Lets just say, if this did occur, they say the road to hell is paved with good intentions. The children didn't ask to be born, but A woman, five kids different fathers, her allowances, hidden and hand outs, small donation towards rent & council tax, I think a pound each, came to almost twice I earnt before tax.
I don't like the term "single parent" bandied about as it is it covers too many genuine cases; where it's a single parent family through death, one parent just 'runs off' with some one else, or the father of the child just leaves the woman pregnant, help should be given to these to get them back on their feet.
It's the "professional single mothers" and "professional leave a 'brat' anywhere fathers" that really need targeting.
2007-01-10 01:26:44 · answer #2 · answered by Daedalus 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
There should be some restriction else people will and do take advantage of the current situation to get more money by having more children. On the other hand, if you cut off funds then the children will be the ones to suffer the most. Maybe there should be sterilization after so many children are born. Otherwise, go to work and support the kids yourself.
2007-01-10 01:16:13 · answer #3 · answered by ThePerfectStranger 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Definately - as a father of 2 that would love to have a bigger family but cannot afford it. I get a bit fed up hearing about fathers of 15 or 16 living on benefits that have never worked when I'm out there slogging my nads off.
Get them working - there's always work, and there's always something everyone can do regardless of imagined health problems
2007-01-10 01:19:28 · answer #4 · answered by chillipope 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
oh hell yes
i have three children i work i pay my taxes so that some lazy fat cow with a different boyfriend each week and 10 kids with all different fathers can sit on her fat **** and watch Trisha all day.
none of the fathers or the father they think fathered them pay any money.
why is it one rule for one and another rule for us.
get a job you fat lazy cows and get the snip so i can stop paying taxes for you mistakes in life.
but I'm not bitter lol
2007-01-10 01:19:49 · answer #5 · answered by moodycow 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Sounds good in theory ..but what do you propose...letting the 'excess' children starve?
2007-01-10 20:34:36 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, but this will never happen because it's against those lazy bone idle baffoons Human Rights!
2007-01-10 01:15:14 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋