My Family & I - were at the Cinema - and a very well known UK TV celebrity & his family - where siting next us... my wife told me to ignore him.... I wanted his Autograph & maybe a phone pic...
Do you think I Should have asked him...? Are they Celebs 24/7 or did I do the right thing by pretending not to notice.
2007-01-09 23:54:24 · 27 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
well i see it this way, we have to work our asses of to get money, they get to stand in front of cameras and make millions, in one foto shoot they make more then ill eva make in my life, so if they dont get ther privacy, its ther problem, coz they have the life they can get what eva they want wheneva.
personally i think u should have asked him but after the move not while the movie was on
2007-01-10 22:39:16 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think before or after the film there would have been no harm in asking at all. Most celebrities have time for the public/fans. They are all entitled to privacy, just like anyone of us - but the privacy part is more to do with the media if you ask me. Camping out outside celebs houses and constantly harrasing them - now that's not on.
2007-01-10 00:06:02 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Its part of being a celeb, they all know that when they become famous. There are celebs out there that want to be recognised that crave attention and if that was one of those celebs then I'm certain they'd have loved it for you to be asking for an autograph, but on the other hand there are celebs that are more reclusive and prefer to be left alone, still i feel they have a duty to recognise their fans as their fans recognise them.
2007-01-10 00:15:26 · answer #3 · answered by Woodman 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
NO - they should remember who made them a celebrity in the first place - their fans - without their fans they would be nothing.
They may want privacy now they've reached the peak of their career but they should remember that to get their wealth and lifestyle in the first place they needed all the publicity they could get. They can't have the best of both worlds.
2007-01-10 00:26:29 · answer #4 · answered by georgeygirl 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think you did the right thing. We all have a right to privacy. They are not celebs 24/7 only while on the set or stage. It's their job. They all have PR people to arrange off air, off stage events. You go through their people. My spouse is in law enforcement and I go through this all the time.............. If it's serious enough to call us at 3AM then call 911.
2007-01-10 00:06:38 · answer #5 · answered by thefinalresult 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
They chose to be in the spotlight and they should have the honor and dignity to show appreciation to the fans that elevated thier careers.
I say sure, ask them, be polite and respectfull of their humanity.
If the Goverment can read e.mails and private letters and say it is to stop terrorists, then a Celebrity has no right to privacy because they chose to be in the Public Spotlight and they rely on the Public to keep them there.
2007-01-10 00:06:05 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
You didn't do a bad thing by ignoring him, but some celebs say they love people to come up to them, you could have approached them and told them how much you like their work, or whatever, and been prepared to go away and not be offended if they ask you not to bother them. Just don't latch on to them and talk for hours, that would get on anyones nerves!
2007-01-10 00:02:53 · answer #7 · answered by emily_jane2379 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Depends on the celeb I think. Some of them are only famous for being famous and they need the adoration of fans because they have no other talent than looking pretty or having big boobs - Jordan, Jade, Victoria Beckham. They just love to see themselves plastered over the papers and mags.
There are others who are reluctant celebs, who prefer to use their talents on stage or screen to portray a character and then retire to do their own thing - Robert DeNiro, Christian Bale.
So I would say it depends who it was.
2007-01-10 00:00:57 · answer #8 · answered by chillipope 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
nicely there are 3 kinds of celebrities those who do issues that are patently not gonna supply them privateness(Miley Cyrus),And those who's occupation levels lead them to be without privateness(Justin Beiber) and those that beg for privateness (Demi Lovato). definite, they are entitiled to there privacybut the element is once you're at a element of attractiveness you should study that the privateness that you do nonetheless have (at your residence) is the kind you want to apply responsibliy.There are some celebrities who're very able yet you could barley get a glimpse of them contained in the real international(Enimem).yet they ought to reluize that that's exciting yet you should apply it properly. So yeah they are entitled to there privicy
2016-12-02 02:08:36 · answer #9 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think you should give them space, after all they are not at work. There are certain celebrities who milk it for all its worth and seek out the media attention and I reckon they deserve all they get when it backfires. Mostly, though they just wanna go and do their job and lead a normal life which doesn't involve being pestered all the time in public.
2007-01-10 00:04:38 · answer #10 · answered by Bumble 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
when they are on tv the cinema screen or the football pitch they are only doing a job. they deserve privacy the same as everyone else. its the fame seeking wannabees who crave the attention that go looking for the fans (paris hilton and posh becks take note)
2007-01-10 00:08:53 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋