The two Americas syndrome.
2007-01-09 23:01:45 · 5 answers · asked by Tommy G. 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I think we are weaker and here is why I say that, in my own family I have people that I disagree without being nasty or disagreeable. then they are family members that if you disagree with them they end up hating you.
This is what I see in the US one party ideas are so weak when held up to examination or disagreement does not lead to honest debate, but vitriol,hatred and name calling I will let you decide which party that is.
2007-01-10 01:10:31 · answer #1 · answered by Ynot! 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I would say both.
We are weaker only when we give in to ridiculous gesticulations on either side of the aisle.
We're stronger in the sense that both sides are energetic in bringing about progress toward the America THEY want, and the combined energy is beneficial.
2007-01-10 07:30:39 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Much wiser which equates to strength, demoracy was built upon the presmise that we are free to disagree, and new ideas are formed from listening to the mulitiple views on any subject then after reasoning deciding which course to take. Stronger for if we censor those that oppose us, we no longer have freedom.
2007-01-10 07:07:13 · answer #3 · answered by paulisfree2004 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Which one should be eliminated? I think that the 2 party system has been in existence since the beginning and the place has worked just fine.
Polarity is not the problem. Lunacy is.
2007-01-10 07:08:55 · answer #4 · answered by ? 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It has survived worse division. It makes it stronger than the original.
2007-01-10 07:08:03 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋