Does anybody corcern about this issue or is it just fair to kill innocent people to become more wealthier?
2007-01-09 22:55:17 · 6 answers · asked by itulushootby 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Peace is a myth.World peace has never existed.
2007-01-09 23:06:26 · answer #1 · answered by Tommy G. 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Peace is not free. It comes with a great cost, not only in money but lives as well. Peace came to the USA only after centuries of civil unrest, wars, and investment in security forces and prisons. Much debate and evolution among the people and government also occurred.
Peace on a global scale is not obtainable. Who is going to pay the price. There isn't enough wealth in the world to finance peace on earth.
2007-01-10 07:58:17 · answer #2 · answered by Overt Operative 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
First of all world peace is possible but it depends on your definition if you mean that there will never be skirmishes between nations improbable, 99% of people reading this have conflict in their own families so how do you expect to have complete peace on a global level.
The second part of your question shows you as anti-American because it is stated in a presumption tone that infers the US go around killing people for money.
2007-01-10 09:21:30 · answer #3 · answered by Ynot! 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
World peace will come when every living thing on the planet is wiped out.
Peace is not a natural thing. Balance is, but not peace.
connecting peace to people's wealth is ignorant. it has nothing to do with wealth, and by connecting the two you are clouding the truth in pointless rhetoric.
Try for co-existence at best, but never expect peace.
2007-01-10 07:18:36 · answer #4 · answered by Stone K 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am with you on this. The worlds governments must stop wars as soon as possible other wise we all can die on this planet.
It is bad to kill ppl because of money and unfortunately all wars are about money.
Peace is not a myth!!! Why you cannot kill your neighbor without being prosecuted? The same should be with the wars. War is a crime!!!
One thing is "to dispute". And the other is "to dispute using arms and weapons"!!!
2007-01-10 07:06:35 · answer #5 · answered by truli u 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think it is an unrealistic expectation. Human nature doesn't allow real peace.
2007-01-10 07:07:15 · answer #6 · answered by ? 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋