Has anyone ever heard of send more info? It's an internet company that supposedly pays you for reading emails.........Please any info will help!! THANKS
2007-01-09 22:36:56 · 3 answers · asked by carebarri 2 in Computers & Internet ➔ Internet
www.sendearnings.com. I signed up with them. Yes, it's legitimate, BUT, you only get paid like, 4 cents for each e-mail and you can't get paid until you earn at least $40, then they charge you a $10 processing fee. So it takes you months just to get $30.
Just in case anyone hasn't heard about it, go to the site and they'll explain everything. You get "paid" for reading e-mails and signing up for free trials, websites, joining newsletters etc. None of the entirely free ones pay more than $1. If you sign up for NetFlix or something though, you can get up to $10. So if you were planning on signing up for NetFlix or buying samples of prescriptions and stuff like that anyway, then sendearnings is a great way to get money back on that. If you just want free money, it's going to take FOREVER.
PS: The entire point of sendearnings is to get visitors on their partners website, which means signing up for stuff. That means you will get A LOOOOTTTT of spam mail, so make a new account!! Don't use your personal e-mail account!!!!
Good luck!
2007-01-09 22:43:38 · answer #1 · answered by chica_zarca 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
The Better Business Bureau report on companys of this type:
(We strongly question the company’s reliability for reasons such as that they have failed to respond to complaints, their advertising is grossly misleading, they are not in compliance with the law’s licensing or registration requirements, their complaints contain especially serious allegations, or the company’s industry is known for its fraudulent business practices.)
Additional Information: These are my personal views and in no way reflect the views of Yahoo or any of their Advertiser
2007-01-13 22:20:30 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Very likely a scam. Why would anyone pay someone to read emails?
2007-01-10 06:42:19 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋