I work for the Bush family; So I am really getting a kick out of most of these replies.
Some of you guys are very good at making it sound like you know what you are talking about.
But trust me.... You don't. I think you just want to make yourself sound smart, when in reality you don't know what you are talking about.
This is how bad info gets passed around. If you dont know about the topic....Dont make yourself sound like you do.
Cos some Yahoo! Answerers believe anything they hear.
2007-01-09 22:36:46
·
answer #1
·
answered by abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
I thought Bush was in the lead of all former presidents in funding for alternative fuels.I don't think there is any more personal gain to the Bush family than there is to any American that owns stock.Most portfolios contain investments in one or another oil company.The world runs on oil and is made out of plastic which is made from oil.It is not that we all don't want something different it just that oil is efficient and all the infrastructure is in place.Change will come but oil will be around for a long time.if you can't afford a new vehicle or retro fit an old one cheaply the change over would collapse the economy if there were a readily available alternative.
2007-01-10 06:35:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by Tommy G. 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
Zero.
Okay, I'm not a big Bush fan. The current prez has been the most anti-Constitutional president since Abrahan Lincoln. (If you don't know see the connection, suggest you read "The Real Lincoln")
Anyway, while the Bushies may have done lots of things wrong, the bottom line is this: a priori, no one - NO ONE - knew any better. Example: Would you prefer that Saddam had detonated his first nuke in YOUR city? As far as anyone knew (Saddam, the UN inspectors, the world) Saddam was about to have nuclear weapons to go with his chemical weapons. So how long do you think we should have waited?
All of this is lost in revisionist history - just as Abraham Lincoln being America's Joe Stalin is lost. But get grip! Lung cancer from the Bushies?
Bite me!
2007-01-10 06:33:20
·
answer #3
·
answered by A_Patriot 2
·
1⤊
4⤋
Remember thy have morals read about Prescott bush,he ten times worst then the Kennedy's thy made the movie the Godfather after them
2007-01-10 07:11:19
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Wow, whats next? blaming Bush for Black holes and the cancellation of star search???
its funny how people like you seem to think there is this long complicated conspiracy to run the World by Bush and yet you also would probably proclaim how stupid or ignorant he is.
we had the technology during Clinton and yet he did nothing to promote it... wait let me guess Bush had a machine to send thoughts to Clinton and made him not support those policy... the Dastard!
Look take off the Tin foil hats and get some fresh air, I think you been puffing the wacky tobbaci too long.
2007-01-10 06:31:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by Stone K 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
How many people have you put to sleep with your personal attacks on the Bush family?
2007-01-10 06:33:27
·
answer #6
·
answered by rswdew 5
·
2⤊
2⤋
I would love to answer this, but what is a coherent question from all the anti-Bush gobbledygook you've spouted.
I think the Bush family has killed no one by way of lung cancer.
As Jeopardy host Alex would say, please phrase your question in the form of a question.
2007-01-10 06:29:00
·
answer #7
·
answered by Lt. Dan reborn 5
·
4⤊
3⤋
You are really reaching on this one.
Based on your logic, if you drive a car then you are as guilty as the Bush's.
2007-01-10 06:33:06
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
Zero
2007-01-10 06:46:43
·
answer #9
·
answered by bildymooner 6
·
3⤊
2⤋
Personally, I blame Bush everytime I get my period. (insert sarcasm). Get a new scapegoat.
2007-01-10 06:34:23
·
answer #10
·
answered by kitty fresh & hissin' crew 6
·
2⤊
2⤋