English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

It's time for Bush to admit that 'America has been defeated.'

There is NOTHING we can do to keep the peace in Iraq's Civil War. Read this and tell me what you think:
http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=MTI2YzVjYzlhNGEyMWUyMmJjNzA2NWU4ZjZjN2E3M2U=

My personal message is:

No more American bloodshed! It's time to get out!
Begin the phased withdrawal TODAY, 10 Jan. 2007,
NOT TOMORROW, Mr. Bush!!!

2007-01-09 20:51:15 · 6 answers · asked by Marc Miami 4 in News & Events Other - News & Events

This is no reflection upon the brave troops. This war has been mismanaged since the beginning. Soldiers only do what they are told.

We need to stop blowing up our soldiers, just to protect Bush's silly ego. Let Iraq burn, it's not worth incinerating American trrops. Stop the useless carnage of Americans (and stop the illegal occupation of Iraq!)

2007-01-09 21:06:10 · update #1

6 answers

Bush is to deranged to admit defeat . Get this, in the past two days i've ran across two conservatives on here who are of the belief that the war in Iraq is over and were now just assisting the Iraqi's to make there country a better place! I wish i was kidding, but I'm not. The derangement of the the right is spreading through brain washing.

2007-01-10 01:53:56 · answer #1 · answered by Third Uncle 5 · 2 1

War was started by America. What is happening is after effects of removal of Saddam from the post. Now Americans say that 'there is nothing we can do to keep the peace in Iraq's Civil War' , why they accepted the responsibility. No body will trust them. Safest place for American army will be their own homeland. Is it possible? Obviously there is some big advantage for USA to keep its armed forces active in the area.

2007-01-10 05:13:33 · answer #2 · answered by snashraf 5 · 2 0

our war was against terrorism, not Iraq. sorry but i don't have the answer on why our troops are not out. any other country that fought hard for free democracy was left to set it up with very little to no help. our troops did not have to stay . so i am thinking maybe bush is looking at his own popularity through his own narrow minded eyes.( he cant see beyond himself) .i know there is a lot of hart ache going on in the middle east and many people are having to learn a new way of life ...... so maybe bush thinks he is helping to protect Iraq....... but i don't see how all the killing and hatred will allow positive growth. so maybe its up to us, all the people to show the power of forgiveness and acceptance of all. who knows someone might see and learn, then pass on the teaching..........

2007-01-10 05:23:14 · answer #3 · answered by ? 2 · 2 0

It is only lost if Americans like you (who are not serving in the military) don't have the stomach to let our brave troops finish the job in Iraq. There is NO quick fix other than to train the Iraqis to provide there own security.

PS: The military won the war. It is the politicians both Iraqis and the US who cannot effect a political settlement.

2007-01-10 05:02:54 · answer #4 · answered by mr_methane_gasman 3 · 0 3

Bush is deranged. Trying to make sense to that man is like talking to a wall.

2007-01-10 06:44:34 · answer #5 · answered by Debra D 7 · 4 0

Why would Bush listen to Americans on this issue? Have we suddenly become a nation of military experts? Are you more informed then he? Sometimes, the majority simply means that all the fools agree.

2007-01-10 09:37:10 · answer #6 · answered by JB 6 · 0 3

fedest.com, questions and answers