Is Napoleon the most deserving as the greatest ruler of his time or does he deserve another title?

Question

Explain your answer with details and evidence

Answer 1

Yes, and evidentially most people know very little about him.

He was by far the most intelligent, and commanded the most loyalty. His soldiers and people would have followed him into hell. For a perfect example (its a long, but interesting story), look up Napoleon's return to power in France during 1815.

He was the most avant-garde thinker. He believed that power and leadership were not birthrights and that aristocracy/the old monarchs had no place in the world. Even some of his enemies admitted that he was right, and he did prove right eventually. His Napoleonic Code was one of France's most important (if not, the most important) pieces of legislation.

He also had the most to overcome and accomplished the most. Most people don't even consider the fact that he was a middle-class foreigner who became Emperor of France - pretty remarkable since almost no one goes from being ridiculed in a nation to becoming its absolute leader.

There are many criticisms brought up against him, however they are rather unfounded once the -facts- are looked at.

-The Duke he "kidnapped" (namely Duke d'Enghien), was responsible for the death of 51 innocent civilians on Christmas Eve in a failed attempt to kill Napoleon. In modern terms, Duke d'Enghein would be considered a terrorist leader thus deserved his punishment.

-He was in no way unfair to Britain. Britain literally tried to kill from the moment he first entered battle. Great Britain, who was the real aggressor of the time, saw Napoleon as an example of a thriving republic that needed to be crushed. Britain spent the modern equivalent of $91 trillion dollars to fund people fighting France. Banning trade was more than reasonable.

-Napoleon did not start wars. I cannot tell you the people who don't read and say this statement. He started one war in his life (Egypt); the rest were started by Britain, Russia, Prussia, Austria, or a combination of the above. It was even Russia who started the war in 1812. If you look at the details you'd see that people declared war on him and he would strike faster than they did.

One thing you must remember is that Napoleon eventually was overcome by his enemies, thus everything we read is through the eyes of the winners, namely Britain. People rarely see through the propaganda. He was the most intelligent, daring, and capable man of his age. People call him corrupt, but look at King George III, Tzar Alexander I, or even Pope Pius VII; they were very corrupt, power-hungry men who were far worse men and leaders than Napoleon.

Short Answer: When the real facts are examined, Napoleon truly was the greatest leader of his time.

Answer 2

I say The Undertaker, coz even regardless of the incontrovertible fact that HBK hasn't held the international call for seven years, he's a Grand Slam Champio. The Undertaker isn't a Grand Slam or perhaps Triple Crown Champion. additionally, throughout HBK's first call reign, he held it long sufficient for 8 months. at the same time as The Undertaker has under no circumstances had any long reign as international champion. not in simple terms that, Undertaker additionally hasn't held WWE call for 7 years (he in simple terms gained the international call), additionally he has under no circumstances held the Spinner call belt. So, The Undertaker merits extra, no remember how long his reign could lasts, I in simple terms elect to work out Undertaker gained the WWE Spinner call belt. WQ: sure, for specific. Triple H won't have the means to handle the Legacy and stored getting screwed out of the call for 2 at once PPVs (The Bash and evening Of Champions). So, at Summerslam, DX will reunite to take on the Legacy.

Answer 3

no, he betrayed spain his ally, forced the spainish king to abdicate, he was hipicritical as respect to trading with England. he insisted that his soldiers steal what they needed from local inhabitance he had a duke in a forign country kidnapped and murdered. he was extremely arrogant towards other countries. he is probably best with the title he was given at the time a disturber of the peace.

Answer 4

If I did, would you plagiarize it and use it for homework?