Clinton is a lawyer he knows the law. Technically he only had intimate contact with her but that can still transmit STDs.
At that time President Clinton was going after Microsoft for being a monopoly and Microsoft bought up the defunct NBC bankrupt network then began going after Clinton with the news and often even presented lies to get to him.
MSNBC has had a motto on their newscasts that say steal their lunch and eat it at times.
Somehow they left out the fact that the ugly woman Paula Jones did the whole town, did it on a pool table in front of everyone, that she got a bust job, a nose job, braces, a total cosmetic redo, new outfits in order to make her convincing and people still looked at her to say I do not believe Clinton went after her she is too uuugggllly...oh she also did porns with her husband but MSNBC only said she was the daughter of a preacher..like that works the preachers son I know is now an alcoholic and ex drug addict
do you pay attention to the news at all
2007-01-09 15:43:06 · 10 answers · asked by Faerieeeiren 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
MSNBC every time someone who knew her came on and began to say things about her character would cut it off such that eventually they stopped doing live broadcasts. So it is ok to say only bad about the president but not the truth about credibility and character of a wanna make money woman?
2007-01-09 16:08:56 · update #1
You do not see women chasing Bush but he is not that pretty and his wife is by his side all the time probably just in case someone wants to make an issue and get attention from it. The only woman I ever believed he was with was Monica the others were too quick to go after the money.
2007-01-09 16:10:18 · update #2
I am a female I watched them transform Paula Jones to make her look realistic. They gave her plastic surgery lifted her chest many inches as it sagged down below her waistline as I recall prior to the operations and a better support system probably. If she was credible why did she need such labor intensive alterations on all of her physical attributes. Even the guard remembered she went to the room without being asked up.
2007-01-09 16:12:12 · update #3
I think its such a old subject its not even worth talking about anymore. Newsflash. We are at war. Isnt that more important?
2007-01-09 15:48:27 · answer #1 · answered by War Chimp 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Honestly, the man finally came clean about the affair. He admitted and apologized (like it mattered) for lying...he just did not give details on what exactly he and Monica did. So yes originally he did lie but came clean in the long run.
Yes, I do think that the media went crazy...did the network you mentioned have a vendetta??? Possibly, either way, they made money, hand over fist. Did they destroy Bill??? Not apparently...his wife and daughter are still by his side. And he is one of the most popular and fairly well respected ex-presidents in history.
2007-01-09 23:56:43 · answer #2 · answered by yidlmama 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
downgrading the woman does not paint the bright picture for him, i know all about that kind of talk and it only comes out when someone has something to hide and it is in reality just a cover up because we were not in the room at the time does not mean we can not know. and to broadcast it to the world gave the young people the official presidential approval which over road the parental and health concerns for the upcoming generation's. The fact that he chose to elicit favors from a woman while in marriage and no concern for his divided attentions as a pillar standing in a leadership position, simply disgust my view of..... .
2007-01-10 00:02:09 · answer #3 · answered by Conway 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Please let me know what the past or even present lifestyle of the woman has to do with bil clinton lieing under oath before congress. As we all know, since he has admitted to all of this publicly, he said he did have intamate relations with monica. now, what he was trying to do is use a technical loophole to avoid getting in trouble. Since the way that the question was phrased was "did you have Sex with monica L in the white house" he got to say "no". by dtechnical definition intamate relations and sex are not mutualy inclusive. It all boils down to apples and oranges here.
Did he lie to congress under oath?....YES
was there a technicality that got him out of this?....YES
it was called an election, new congress was elected and they did not have enoug support to get the majority vote they needed to Impeach him. if the hearings had started a few months sooner clinton may well have been the first president ousted from the white house by impeachment.
2007-01-09 23:54:45 · answer #4 · answered by nyxcat1999 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Why should I, That's sheer waste of time considering the real problem of majority of people is economic. News sometimes is fabricated to focus away our attention to important matters that if we pay attention to them we will be one day knock out our head serious problems.
2007-01-09 23:53:31 · answer #5 · answered by wilma m 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think oral sex qualifies as sex! and most people don't seem to remember that Clinton lied UNDER OATH about not having any kind of sexual contact with her. Then he also lied to the america people on tv. it makes you think what else did he lie about in office?
2007-01-09 23:59:38 · answer #6 · answered by shutdown 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Who cares
2007-01-09 23:53:19 · answer #7 · answered by Mr.Robot 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
quit clinton is cool bush is not stop trying to cover it won't work
2007-01-09 23:51:05 · answer #8 · answered by marion r 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
"It depends upon what the meaning of the word is is".
2007-01-09 23:53:43 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
he admitted it later
2007-01-09 23:48:37 · answer #10 · answered by Wyst 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋