English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

14 answers

Just like some people what to just you because they do not understand your question. Ignorant and mean spirited!

Although we are not currently in a direct war with IRAN we are trying to get IRAQ off to a good start and free it of SYRIAN, IRANIANS, and other Terrorists coming into IRAQ.

We know that the President is trying to put IRAQ on a freedom basis before we pull out otherwise it will fall back into the same state it was before we went into that country. RIGHT OR WRONG about the war we must not leave it in a worse shape than what we found it. OTHERWISE they terrorists would have won and they will be right back in this country killing AMERICANS. AMERICANS often like to hide their heads in the sand like they did before Pearl Harbor before WWII. Hitler almost and his friends nearly took over the whole world before we finally was attacked and went after the bad guys. WE MUST NEVER COMPROMISE FREEDOM.

May OUR MILITARY'S LIVES NEVER BE TAKEN FOR GRANTED.

May Politics take a Backseat to COMMON SENSE. My HOPE IS THAT Our TWO Party government can work TOGETHER for the GOOD of the COUNTRY or a third may rise to take their place.

2007-01-09 15:52:10 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

So you think that was the presidents plot right along. Keep the battle going until it leaked out about Iran and it's Nuclear weapons. This way we could be right there to attack??? Never mind the countless American lives that have been lost. Never mind the exhausted military personal who have done tour after tour of duty.
Let's keep the exhausted men and women in this war instead of having them fresh and ready if a war is needed?
Makes no logical sense to me.

2007-01-09 16:12:50 · answer #2 · answered by wondermom 6 · 0 1

George Bush joined the nationwide shield. on the time of the vietnam war, the feds did no longer use nationwide shield troops distant places. it relatively is a present day phenomenon. turning out to be to be a member of the nationwide shield replaced right into a manner of fending off provider. the U. S. knowledgeable him as a pilot, particularly high priced, and then he desperate he might fly not greater, coincidentally refusing to ensue at a actual. officials do no longer understand the place he replaced into, and he had no energetic accountability standards. they are in a position to offer no archives of what he did interior the provider for the full final year. (he does not point out what years his drug background replaced into). Clinton did no longer serve, and admits it. Cheney draft dodged his *** off. And he's a hypocritical hawk. Bush wasted the government guidance qand relied upon dad's effect to work out to it he did no real provider. he's a liar.

2016-10-06 22:28:34 · answer #3 · answered by greenwell 4 · 0 0

Continuing pouring American lives into Iraq to "keep from losing" is not the same thing as winning.
The incompetence in the first years of the Iraq war have made it impossible to come out with a "win". There is no longer a distinct leadership with which to negotiate a surrender or organize a cessation of hostility.
Stop with the nonsense.

2007-01-09 16:27:04 · answer #4 · answered by oohhbother 7 · 0 1

I am liberal and I do not want to have Iraq end as a disaster...Iran needs to be watched carefully and possibly contained...that does not mean i support a president who has not acted with wisdom. You are attempting to make those like me into something you can hate...i am a proud American...let's be on the same side...believing in the Constitution and protecting America can be the same thing...

2007-01-09 15:38:27 · answer #5 · answered by Ford Prefect 7 · 4 1

Bush and the rest of you neocon-nitwits are responsible for creating the situation where Iran’s President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad (along with Venezuela’s and North Korea’s Presidents) can punk Bush to his face. They do it just because they can and so they can make the whole world laugh at him when he appears on TV to make more of his girly-man threats.

Bush administration and republican congressional ignorant-incompetent and arrogance-driven failures in Afghanistan, Iraq, and in the war on terror, combined with their destruction of America’s honor and dignity, has rendered the US largely impotent to do anything about anything, and everyone in the world knows it – except the idiots in charge.

2007-01-09 15:54:31 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Iran wouldn't do anything if not for Bush's war in the first place. Funny how you zealots place the blame of Bush's, Rumfeld's, and Cheney's failure to think beyond next week, on liberals. Bush started a war that he didn't know how to fight, and you want to blame his stupidity on others? So much for conservatives being accountable for their own actions.

2007-01-09 15:40:06 · answer #7 · answered by Chi Guy 5 · 4 3

No one wants to "loose" a war, or lose a war, either.

Bush got us into a war based on his lies, and his desire to avenge his father's administration. No one can deny any of that.

And maybe we would like to get out of Iraq so we have enough soldiers to fight against Iran should they do something stupid, like, oh say, attack us?????

Take some spelling and logic classes. . .

2007-01-09 15:53:11 · answer #8 · answered by volleyballchick (cowards block) 7 · 2 2

so... what will Iran do?

invade or something?

if Iran so much as sneezed in Iraq's direction, we would be there with bells on... they know that... and they wouldn't dare...

2007-01-09 15:39:04 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

http://www.iranfocus.com/modules/news/ Try reading the news from other sources. You may be surprised at the information you receive. I sure was.

2007-01-09 16:27:52 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers