Why are divorce courts so biased in the favor of women?

Question

Seriously...divorce courts grant lazy, golddigging housewives tons of money a month, they get the kids, the support, everything. No wonder why so many ex-wives get killed. I'm tired of this stupid *** feminist society putting women on a pedestal while mistreating men. We are often attempted through school and the media to be brainwashed into thinking its women being mistreated, but reality says vice versa

Answer 1

I don't believe that the courts are fair either. There are allot of fathers out there that could raise their kids better than the mothers. Maybe there is a judge that can give us a good answer.

Answer 2

The courts aren't bias. Think about this; the woman has custody of the kids, the responsibility of getting them fed, to school or taking care of them all day and all night and most a job. The freedom of going out nights, working overtime, not feeling good and going to bed just isn't there like it is for the noncustodial parent. Neither is the ability to call and say I'm not going to make visitation today or not showing up for visitation. Tons of money usually isn't tons of money when you think about a house payments or rent, electric, phone, cable, food, clothes, school, school supplies, school activities, dance, activities with kids and as they get old the Mom I need syndrome hits, etc. This doesn't even include car insurance and the unexpected car repair or machine breakdown.

I really think it depends on the person and the responsibility they want to take. Both sides should be working for the best care of that child emotionally and physically and that should be the #1 concern.

Answer 3

Only lazy golddiggers are favored. (Male or female.) Women with earning potential find that divorce courts favor lazy golddigging men.

I wish what you said weren't true. Had I known, I would have perfected the lazy golddigging housewife act instead of going to engineering school. However, the lazy golddigging man is more favored by the courts than his female counterpart--everybody thinks "what a GREAT guy who wants to stay home with the kids!" He can do no wrong. Even if he used to be an engineer.

Answer 4

Statistic could properly be manipulated relatively hassle-free. Systematically, women human beings have a background of being offered Custody. of direction women human beings have been the known Care taker because of the fact the daddy replaced into working. I have no thought how previous you're, yet I surely have various pals that the two have been compelled to take a spare room at a kinfolk or on a pals settee because of the fact paying new child help for 2 or 3 young infants leaves many adult males broke without threat of beginning a clean existence. yet, women human beings have enjoyed the convenience of turning out to be few variations to their way of existence after divorce. How might you opt to be paying $3 hundred a week for 3 young infants? i understand a guy who pays that plenty. How might you opt to be paying on a house you could no longer even stay in? might you enjoy your ex-wifes new boyfriend drowsing on your mattress or spending greater time with your infants than you? The tone of your question relatively shows your immature and scarcity real existence expereince to assume women human beings purely divorce abusive adult males. In maximum all situations the two spouses exchange into abusive in direction of one yet another. returned I especially doubt you have the foresight nor are you probable progressed sufficient to make your recommendations up the undeniable fact that girls persons are no longer the harmless sufferers they have been displayed as.

Answer 5

LMAO...you know nothing sweets if you bleive that divorce courts grant women tons of money. First of all CHILD support is for the children, the husband HELPED to create those children, he was having fun so guess what...he gets to help support them financially whether he wants to be married or not honey bunch. The femitists you are whining about acutally worked an MEN'S favor because since the ERA passed spousal support is a thing of the past. The only time spousal support is awarded these days is when the (in this case we will use wife) had not worked outside the home during the time SHE was raising the children, she is uaually awarded support for not more than six months. That is what the courts beleve to be ample time for her to procure employment even if it is only part time. Now, when you have some REALISTC and KNOWEDGEBASED facts come back...until then I suggest you tuck your teeny weenie back in it's shell and go back under your rock.
Oh and as for the father raising the children...that would be great...except that only a HANDFUL at best has ever gone for sole custody...the rest are too busy at the singles bars trying to pick up 18 year olds.

Answer 6

In some cases I agree. I know my own case, I made less money than my ex, and the judge granted him to figure in the cost of health needs for the kids INTO the child support - so not only do i HAVE to (court ordered) keep health insurance on my children, but I also have to pay out almost a $1000 out of pocket before HE pays towards medical bills.

So its not necessarily the man that gets the shaft sometimes....... do more research before pointing a finger!!

Answer 7

Up until the middle of the last century most women were just property of a male---a father or husband. They had no equality in the legal system or society. Beginning in the 1950s or so, the pendulum swung the other way and women were given exceptional privilege. Much of that is now balancing out.
But it is still hilarious that unlike India, England or the Philippines, the U.S. is too provincial to have had a female head.

Answer 8

Yes you are RIGHT !!!!!!!!

Its actually because of the femanist groups. They are behind the "unconstitutional protection order" crap . They convince women to get them for an advantage in custody fights. A man then is forced from his home, deprived of his children, and treated like a criminal on top of the fact the accuser "a woman" did not have to call one witness, provide any evidence, and the man doesn't even get a chance to defend himself before an order is put in place, and then he isn't even eligible to modify it for at least four years. The ********** system sucks, and you can thank women activists

Answer 9

I lost my children all the house hold goods i payd 4 & have to pay child suport to a man who was right into domestic violance against me infrount of our children & was having an affare. My crime I have bipolar court dismised we cant have children rased by someone who dispite their illness & hubbies violance was the primary care giver of 2 obviously well & happy children heck no. hes just violant & that will meraculously go just away NOT! Now the children have grown up to be bullies too. Why cant woman wont the treatment they disurve & secure future 4 their children with out being labeld gold diggers. Oh & i gave up my finacial independents & business so he could have a stay at home mum 4 our children.

Answer 10

Because the more money you pay for alimony and child support,they get 2% on EVERY CHECK as a processing fee.

edit: a pre-nup works too.