Recently, Robert Kiyosaki repeated an oft-quoted idea that flying is safer than driving (http://finance.yahoo.com/columnist/article/richricher/19601) based on the number of people killed per year in the activities.
I believe this comparison to be flawed. Another common statistic is that most auto accidents happen within 5 miles of home. This is likely to be because people do most of their driving near their home, and their brains are probably on auto-pilot when they're near home too.
Same principle with flying vs. driving. More people spend more time on the road and more people drive than fly. People driving probably have 2-3 people on average with them, and people flying have 100-200. I think a fair comparison would compensate for miles travelled, the amount of time in transit, leave out the local driving that doesn't substitute for flying, etc.
Would some stastician help me answer this question?
If it's a good question, please gimme a thumbs up!
2007-01-09
13:44:42
·
3 answers
·
asked by
aaronchall
3
in
Science & Mathematics
➔ Mathematics