http://patriotsquestion911.com/
2007-01-09 11:49:59 · 9 answers · asked by dstr 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Both partys and a wealth of intelligence and military back grounds...there is something wrong here folks...3000 of OUR fellow citizens were murderd and we only spent 15 million investigating it.
But spent 45 million on Clintons BJ.
2007-01-09 11:57:34 · update #1
Citicop
What about all the other ones?
2007-01-09 12:01:00 · update #2
Capt. Gregory M. Zeigler, PhD, U.S. Army – Former U.S. Army Intelligence Officer
Statement 9/19/06: "I knew from September 18, 2001, that the official story about 9/11 was false. ... [A]nomalies poured in rapidly: the hijackers' names appearing in none of the published flight passenger lists, BBC reports of stolen identities of the alleged hijackers or the alleged hijackers being found alive, the obvious demolitions of WTC1, 2, and 7, the lack of identifiable Boeing 757 wreckage at the Pentagon ... Link to full statement
2007-01-09 12:03:05 · update #3
Capt. Eric H. May, U.S. Army (ret) – Former Army Intelligence officer. Former inspector and interpreter for the Intermediate Nuclear Forces Treaty team.
Essay: "As a former Army officer, my tendency immediately after 911 was to rally 'round the colors and defend the country against what I then thought was an insidious, malicious all-Arab entity called Al-Qaida. In fact, in April of 2002, I attempted to reactivate my then-retired commission to return to serve my country in its time of peril. ...
Now I view the 911 event as Professor David Griffin, author of The New Pearl Harbor, views it: as a matter that implies either
2007-01-09 12:04:54 · update #4
A) passive participation by the Bush White House through a deliberate stand-down of proper defense procedures that (if followed) would have led US air assets to a quick identification and confrontation of the passenger aircraft that impacted WTC 1 and WTC 2, or worse ...
B) active execution of a plot by rogue elements of government, starting with the White House itself, in creating a spectacle of destruction that would lead the United States into an invasion of the Middle East ..." http://mujca.com/captain.htm
2007-01-09 12:05:19 · update #5
Only if you are a Neocon. Then you can dismiss anything that isn't pro Bush and for the domination of the Middle East. We will pretend 9/11 was a long time ago and not worth addressing, even if it is questioned by lifelong military men, and even those who were on the 9/11 commission. We will gloss over Iraq not being part of the legitimate response to 9/11, but rather thrown in by Bush when the country was not paying attention and still wanting revenge for 9/11.
2007-01-09 11:57:16 · answer #1 · answered by michaelsan 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Interesting to say the least. September eleventh is going down in history right next to the Kennedy assassination, we'll never know the truth.
2007-01-09 20:10:19 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hey! Whats wrong with "tin foil hats"?? I know my brain is safe from mind control waves the governement sends out.
2007-01-09 20:02:58 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
People need to start getting their news fromt he alternative media, the mainstream media is run by the shadow governement.
2007-01-09 20:00:37 · answer #4 · answered by George Noory 1 · 2⤊ 1⤋
What answerers 3 and 4 said.
Sorry, man.
Bad source, bad facts.
2007-01-09 20:09:50 · answer #5 · answered by STILL standing 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes.
Anyone who cites former Rep. Cynthia McKinney as a credible source is mistaken.
2007-01-09 19:58:54 · answer #6 · answered by Citicop 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Cynthia McKinney blows all credibility to your link.
2007-01-09 19:59:26 · answer #7 · answered by Bawney 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Yes they can.
2007-01-09 20:14:04 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
You forgot the part "In a thunderstorm"....what were we talking about......
2007-01-09 19:54:43 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋