While we are over there in the region why not clean out Syria, and the entire African Continent?
2007-01-09 11:37:56 · 14 answers · asked by SICKO 2 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
In a perfect world where liberals would actually let us win a war I would not have problem with your plan. We can win easily with air strikes and such.
But since our liberal buddies are so set against us winning I'm gonna have to say we take a pass on those places for now.
We can discuss this further at the next family reunion where all us geniuses will be in one room!
2007-01-09 11:45:40 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
I have to wonder if there is a touch of sarcasm in the second statement, or if you just do not know the difference between the Iranian Shia movement and the Sunnis?!
In answer to your question, we need to deal with Iran to bring stability to not only Afghanistan, Pakistan and Syria/Lebanon, but the entire Middle East! The recruiting and arming of Shia faithful into radicalized militant groups like Hizbollah and the Mahdi Militia is a trend that needs to be eradicated!
2007-01-09 11:52:39 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think of you're highlighting what a super form human beings think of . whether this is not common just to pull the troops out , whether i think of the government would desire to be putting extra attempt into making the plan to do in simple terms that . i replaced into horrified throughout yesterdays PMQ that the fact we in uk spend the 2d optimum volume interior the international on defence !! presumable the u . s . a . are first , yet why would desire to we be ahead of Russia and China as an occasion who've lots larger populations . It strikes me that we attempt to remedy to many different peoples themes as quickly as we've better than sufficient back interior the united kingdom the different undertaking that infuriates me is this female went over to Sudan to help their international locations infants be knowledgeable !! if that's the way our electorate get taken care of while they are attempting to improve the situation in Sudan why would desire to we worry to help them at all the information are the scholars named the teddy undergo after between the favourites interior the class , and it type of feels simply by fact of one stupid idiots criticism this female is imprisoned , this is ridiculous
2016-10-30 11:36:39 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
We won't need to. We would have them flanked on both sides by a military that is not too busy to go in if need be. They would immediately calm the rhetoric for fear that they could be the next target.
2007-01-09 12:00:29 · answer #4 · answered by Raalnan5 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
.. i think troops in iran would be sending them to be exterminated ... i dont think that would work , iranians wouldnt cave like iraqis did, thats just my feeling ... no i think it will have to be bombing infrastructure ... syria wouldnt be too much of a problem most likely ... africa, we have them killing each other off pretty good for now .... but iran i think they would need to be sanctioned hard for a long while before actually going in on the ground ...
2007-01-09 11:46:37 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I think Iran will be in March when the weather is right.
2007-01-09 11:42:09 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
That's the real reason for the build-up or "surge" Bush will be announcing. He has devious reasons for everything he proposes.
2007-01-09 11:52:12 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Since when is Iran in Africa?
2007-01-09 12:53:44 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Send them to China to get all our money back.
2007-01-09 11:42:12 · answer #9 · answered by normy in garden city 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't thinks so. With things going the way they are, our troops will be collecting social security at that point.
2007-01-09 11:43:35 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋