I think WWE is starting to lose it. do u think they will come back and always be better than TNA cuz right now they r. WWE has most of the superstars christian cage is considered a superstar in TNA where in the WWE he is nothing bcuz hes surrounded by all these really good superstars
2007-01-09 10:59:00 · 10 answers · asked by ksoccer37 2 in Sports ➔ Wrestling
tna is way better they don't have stupid skits like Rossie and Donald they have much smarter writers
2007-01-09 11:03:16 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
The WWE has dropped the ball, night after they have horrible shows like last night's raw where people chanted "change the channel" and "we want wrestling" and I even heard "TNA" You know it's getting bad when people pay money to go to your events just to chant about how much they don't like your product. You might not think that TNA has many "superstars" but that is just because you don't watch TNA, if you did take the time to watch TNA you would realize that they have a great product, their show is very entertaining and it always delivers, while when you watch Raw, you'll be bored to death by Trump vs Rosie or John Cena vs Khali. The WWE in my opinion only has a few wrestlers that are actually talented and entertaining to watch, Shawn Michaels, Edge, Jeff Hardy, Chris Benoit, Paul London, Brian Kendrick, CM Punk, Jimmy Yang, and Finlay. All the other wrestlers that they have are just untalented slobs who don't have any skill and the WWE knows it, yet can't seem to do anything about it. Watch TNA, it really is better.
2007-01-09 11:13:46 · answer #2 · answered by Scott Justice 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Of course TNA is a lot better. Most WWE wrestlers are too slow and don't have much talent. And with wrestlers like John Cena, The Great Kali, MVP, the booguey man and other useless wrestlers, WWE's level has droped big time
2007-01-09 11:42:46 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
WWE is more storyline based. TNA is more atheletic based. I watch both though to see a really good fight, I'm TNA all the way. WWE is great for laughs and they pull off a good match or two.
2007-01-09 11:29:11 · answer #4 · answered by friggin_express101 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
tna is most definetly better than wwe because raw sucks so does ecw and the only good about wwe is smackdown. did you guys see how benoit was screwed from getting a title oppurtunity after being irish wipped against the steel post or turnbuckles then kennedy pinned him 1 2 3. how stupid. wwe is collapsing. but tna is rising(thank god)
2007-01-09 11:25:37 · answer #5 · answered by mamas_grandmasboy06 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
deffinitley not man WWE is way better and always will be, not to mention TNA ha sreally bad actors and actresses and like sometimes WWE makes it seem less scripted but i still like to watch TNA alot bc mostly when they fight its better, and i also like Abyss and Sting and Kurt Angle but for now WWE is better and even though WWE sometimes looks like ther losing it they usually come back and fix it so ....yea
2007-01-09 11:05:04 · answer #6 · answered by Lava 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
WWE! Tna is way outdated true it has no annying skits. Still, WWE has awesome wrestling real appearance and a cool storyline.WOOT!WWE!
2007-01-09 11:07:22 · answer #7 · answered by Brent . 1 · 0⤊ 2⤋
no tna is going down hill they even stopped paying for the wrestlers cars and hotel rooms
2007-01-09 11:28:06 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
raw is better than tna tna sucks and u can quote me on that
2007-01-09 12:03:10 · answer #9 · answered by allen g 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Limewire is a good source.
2007-01-13 10:02:53 · answer #10 · answered by _victoria_ 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋