It is very common practice of the US to launch missile air strikes against populated areas if they think someone wanted is hiding there somewhere, and usually they kill the guy but they also kill many innocent civilians. After that, the US officials say they are sorry(not), and case closed. And they don’t care because it was “3rd World” Nation civilians.
How about if a “3rd World” Nation wanted someone and thought the guy was hiding in a US town, then send a “3rd World” cruise missile to blow up that US town, and then just say sorry, and case closed?
Would the US send a cruise missile too if that wanted guy was hiding in Paris, or somewhere in China?
How about if the US suspected a wanted guy was hiding in a US town would they send a missile to blow the town up, then no criminal repercussions, no monetary indemnifications, and just say sorry, and case closed?
2007-01-09 10:17:47 · 5 answers · asked by f_vidigal 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
What is the difference between innocent US civilians, innocent “3rd World” Nation civilians, and innocent Chinese civilians?
Are the innocent US civilians prettier? US civilians can suffer pain and the others don’t? US civilians have hopes, dreams and families; and the others don’t? Does US civilians are worth more than other Human Beings?
Is US ARROGANT and Inhumane???
2007-01-09 10:18:11 · update #1
Daniel S., OR MAYBE THE US IS THE HITLER NOW, AND YOU KNOW "Straighted Out"!!!!!
2007-01-09 10:25:40 · update #2
RULING THE WORLD????!!!!! You are very ARROGANT and STUPID. KEEP DREAMING YOU ****! You know what happed to hitler?
2007-01-09 10:28:04 · update #3
Yes they do
2007-01-09 10:27:42 · answer #1 · answered by BRITS OUT 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
If a terrorist was hiding in Paris, all that we would have to do is tell the Government of France, and they would go and arrest him. If a government will not maintain law and order by preventing its guests from using its territory to attack other people, then it is not a legitimate government.
I do not believe in targeting innocent civilians, and I think that if the terrorists can be gotten by other means, then by all means, try to spare the civilians. But some terrorists hid behind civilians and attack from there, because they think that they are immune from retaliation. What are we supposed to do? Allow the terrorists to get away with murder? Killing the terrorists might kill fewer people in the long run, because a dead terrorist cannot continue to kill more people.
Sometimes you have to choose the lessor of two evils.
2007-01-09 18:30:54 · answer #2 · answered by Randy G 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No. I don't. And I'm a citizen.
And by the way,
Civilians don't shoot missiles. I don't shoot missiles.
You can't compare the U.S. to Hitler.
What's your problem? U.S. civilians didn't do anything to you.
Talk to the U.S. Military if you're angry...
You don't get angry at police for doing a good job, do you?
2007-01-09 18:27:37 · answer #3 · answered by Joshua 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
tough cookies dude. keep your nose clean or Team AMerica will come and straighten you out.
2007-01-09 18:21:49 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
CRack SMoker!
2007-01-09 18:39:33 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋