English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

And if you think that I'm Arnold Scwarzenegger, just testing the water, then you vud ve wong.

2007-01-09 09:13:40 · 17 answers · asked by Panama Jack 4 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

17 answers

Sure. Why not? If Congress is prepared to give in to illegal immigrants - why not give in to one who is legal?

2007-01-09 10:12:11 · answer #1 · answered by Huero 5 · 1 0

Tough question.....I think that there are some immigrants that are more american than people that are born here....I guess I feel that if we are going to have a true representive government then we should allow any person who is a Legal US Citizen run...and let the people decide....I do think there should be a time limit though....like that must be legal and have lived here for more than say 15 years....I don't think Arnold should run though....but a legal immigrant...sure

2007-01-09 09:21:02 · answer #2 · answered by yetti 5 · 1 1

by no ability, EVER for one guy!! fantastically Arnold Schwarzennegger!! He has grew to grow to be into the most insincere political hack you would possibly want to ever believe!! he's appearing some issues as we communicate right here in California basically to make himself seem good to the electorate in only over 2 months, jointly consisting of his so-referred to as skill coverage with England, and consisting of his raising of the minimum salary!! It finally ends up making him appear as if a well-known human being (and he's conventional with basically the thanks to objective this!), yet I worry for what he will do after he's re-elected. and the way evidently now, he will be re-elected! the guy is only a Bush retread, and that i do not and could by no ability believe him! So pay attention, you human beings outdoors of California--if we modify the regulation, he's coming to get YOU next!!

2016-12-28 13:26:09 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Natural-born Americans do a fine enough job of destroying freedom. I fail to see what the benefit would be in making the pool of prospective masters that much larger.

2007-01-09 09:45:06 · answer #4 · answered by Zombie 7 · 0 0

No it shoudn't. Our Founding Fathers were smart, and we should leave things the way they are! Besides, Arnold is a Kennedy, and having a Kennedy these days for president scares the dooky out of me!

2007-01-09 09:26:35 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

No. There will be plenty of candidates without having to rewrite our Constitution for him. If he wanted to be President, he should have thought of that before he was born in Austria.

Yeah-- I KNOW he did not have a choice. Too bad, life can be tough.

2007-01-09 09:19:48 · answer #6 · answered by Git r' done 2 · 1 0

Arnold always became number 1 at every thing he tried. love him or hate him he is a strong willed and motivated man that just wont quit. regan was an actor.

2007-01-09 10:46:14 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No and I'm a Republican Arnold Lover

2007-01-09 09:30:05 · answer #8 · answered by bob b 3 · 1 0

No- -- jeez, its bad enough we have people complaining about a muslim being elected and swearing on the koran. All we need is some non-us-born buy running for president.

2007-01-09 09:18:46 · answer #9 · answered by dapixelator 6 · 1 0

NO!

I voted for him against Angelides but do not want foreign born to be able to be president. I want someone with naturally UN-split loyalties to country.

2007-01-09 09:58:50 · answer #10 · answered by DAR 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers