I really thought she was a lesbian!!!!
2007-01-09 08:12:34 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
No, but I am a bigot against those who can't spell or be bothered to use spell check......dimwit.
And why answer if you don't know who Ruth Kelly is........... oh yeah ..... your American point collectors..... The bain of Answers
2007-01-09 08:19:36 · update #1
In my haste, I've set myself up for a fall here!!!
2007-01-09 08:25:08 · update #2
What do you mean, "in my haste"? You've been making a fool of yourself on Y!A for months.
2007-01-09 10:10:12 · answer #1 · answered by Trust Me 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
No, I'm not shocked, it's a free world. If she thought something wasn't working for her child, as a mother she would pull out all stops and find something that does!
I can't see what being a lesbian has to do with it. Wasn't this to do with removing her child from a state school to a private one?
2007-01-09 08:22:20 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
whos Ruth Kelly
2007-01-09 08:18:17 · answer #3 · answered by hey 4 · 0⤊ 3⤋
She is a bit ug.. But a parent should do the best for their child in education.
I would have done exactly the same.
Good onya Ruth
2007-01-09 08:17:53 · answer #4 · answered by davie 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Not shocked, but disappointed given her previous position. As for her sexual orientation that really has nothing to do with anyone other than Ruth and her partner.
2007-01-09 08:18:52 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Haven't you heard of artificial insemination, who cares if shes a lesbian or not, shes still human as is her child and she has a right to choose who educates that child.
2007-01-09 09:14:54 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
OOH, The Yanks are here with their illiteracy, judging from the answers already given.
Ruth Kelly has had sex?
God, this country is going downhill rapidly.
2007-01-09 08:16:45 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Not at all, I don't see why she shouldn't do what she thinks is best for her kid, after all she is a mother as well as a politician, and as far as her kid is concerned she is his mother not his parliamentary representative, and I have no idea about her sex life and quite frankly don't really care
2007-01-09 09:49:29 · answer #8 · answered by used to live in Wales 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
not really. the woman is a hypocrite. though i couldn't believe she is able to give her child a private education, considering the lies labour have spouted people with, regarding blair's manefesto on education, education, education
2007-01-09 11:09:24 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
She's going for a burton w. Blair so probably doesn't care and can compromise her 'principles' quietly in opposition soon!
2007-01-09 08:16:44 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
she can b a lesbian and have children but yes just because he has difficultys and she can afford to pay for private education she has put her child in to a private school. i had difficultys at school but was not moved to a private school i had to manage where i was.
2007-01-09 08:18:43 · answer #11 · answered by Mrs Bond 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋