Wow, people. I am truly disappointed that not one of you saw that that was not intended as a genuine question but as a criticism of those who ask such questions on these blogs as "Why are liberals/conservatives/communists/environmentalists etc.. so stupid."
I thought that, by making the title of the question so incredibly ridiculous, coupled with the utter lack of actual *opinions* being expressed as superior to those of all others, it would be plainly obvious that my question was a joke.
2007-01-09 07:48:32 · 16 answers · asked by Person 2 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
I agree with you 100% all of the time. Everyone else is stupid.
2007-01-09 08:20:35 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Had the explanation not been included with the question, unfortunately, it would have HAD to have been taken in the literal sense. For obvious reasons. There are so many people on this "forum" who display, in the genuine sense, that inane ignorance and arrogance that your question defines so perfectly, that one almost has to respond in a chastising and accusatory manner. Again, without the explanation, "you" simply have to assume that the originator of the question is a complete and utter moron. And... then, of course, one would have to tell him so. It is really too bad and so very sad that the "airways" are jam-packed with the kinds of people that inspired your question. I, personally, rarely pass on an opportunity to inform an "obvious idiot" that he/she IS obviously an idiot, followed with the reason WHY they have demonstrated so "elequently" that they are, in fact, an idiot. I can appreciate your thought process; and... remember, you get three points back when you choose a "Best Answer", answer one more and your even. So this wasn't a waste at all.
2007-01-09 19:32:48 · answer #2 · answered by Adam in Vegas 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In other words - you are disappointed because other people took your question seriously?
Might I gently suggest your contribution was not as "clever" as you thought? And that perhaps the problem lies not with those who responded but rather with the one who tried to do something he/she was unable to pull off?
Those with limited intelligence and lack of tolerance always think those who do not agree with them, or do not understand them, are stupid. You tried to pretend one thing - and did it so badly, others treated you as what you pretended to be.
Maybe they see something you don't.
2007-01-09 15:57:35 · answer #3 · answered by Uncle John 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋
what a waste of 5 points, thanx for the 2 though
2007-01-09 15:51:46 · answer #4 · answered by headstr8 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Peoples' snap decisions force wrong conclusions
Sorry to hear that you have fallen victim to this.
I feel you, hope someday we can see a change
2007-01-09 15:59:13 · answer #5 · answered by Red 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sarcasm is lost in text
2007-01-09 16:11:23 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
wat a waste of 5 pts...oh well at least i got my 2 pts. thanx. and one more question. since u dont agree with all my opinions, should i call u stupid. ok i wiil cuz u r actin lik one. stupid u.
2007-01-09 16:00:01 · answer #7 · answered by rajstar100 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
clearly, you do not agree with all of my opinions, should I now consider you stupid too?
2007-01-09 15:53:26 · answer #8 · answered by msdeville96 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
In essence you are doing it all over again.
2007-01-09 17:35:27 · answer #9 · answered by BK 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You dont need an answer...you need a hickie!
You need a hickie & an orgasm.
2007-01-09 16:14:20 · answer #10 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋