most think the shourd is a fake but if it is shouldn't it be considered a masterpiece like the Mona Lisa and David and things like that because if it is fake it's a very good one
2007-01-09 07:13:47 · 5 answers · asked by ryan s 5 in Arts & Humanities ➔ History
It's like many of the great master pieces in that it's an expression of the artists faith. I think it should still be appreciated in those terms despite the apparent lack of authenticity.
2007-01-09 07:18:47 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah. Even though I think it's fake I think it should be considered a masterpiece
2007-01-09 15:18:09 · answer #2 · answered by AL IS ON VACATION AND HAS NO PIC 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There was 13th century artist that originally created it. He was a very inventive artist. He had made a wood statue of Christ first in a burial position, doused it with dye and placed it on the cloth to press it down. That was how it was made.
2007-01-09 15:18:18 · answer #3 · answered by ? 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
In the word of PT Barnum it would be a "genuine fake."
2007-01-09 15:56:05 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yeah,because its a old fake
2007-01-09 15:16:59 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋