You are so right .
2007-01-09 05:38:31
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
I particaly agree with your question, but time restrictions would prohibit this as you suggest, however if the people had the opportunity to elect our own reps, with out interference from our slanted news media ,and where the running field was level , by doing away with corporate and lobbyist big money, that gives one candidate so much more exposure and build up over the others who are not receiving these bribes,then and only then can we expect to have true representative gov, therefore all campaign funds should be by the gov, equally to each candidate,
2007-01-09 06:03:36
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
We're intelligent enough to know that it is NOT a solution.
There are reasons we have representative goverment. First off, we "hire" those people to do the work so we can go about our business in our daily lives. We citizens can't possibly be involved in every decision that needs to get made in goverment.
Voter turn out is poor and that's one every 1 or 2 years at most. Can you imagine voter turn out if we had to vote on everything. Nothing would get done and things would still be eventually dealt with by a small number of people.
2007-01-09 05:39:26
·
answer #3
·
answered by dapixelator 6
·
3⤊
2⤋
this is often mentioned the Democrats and liberals like the undeniable fact that there are poor human beings on welfare, simply by fact it ensures them a relentless base. yet as authentic or truer, than this previous observed, is that Republicans like having immigrants come into the U. S. and "stay the yankee dream" (i.e. get specific favourite treament loans you and that i could under no circumstances get to open a Subway sandwich save). ...the belief being, supposedly, that this is a sort of goodwill ambassadorship to the international, to the individuals back homestead in India or anyplace while human beings bypass to u . s . a . and are taken care of like princes, while in comparison with homestead. no person ever does something with regard to the preferential scientific care given to human beings from places like India or China while they arrive right here. there's no way we could ever open a eating place. yet those penniless paupers from those international locations get specific loans and very own 60% of the eating places in our united states of america. How's that?
2016-10-30 10:51:47
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
This country was founded by decent moral person with character who wrote doctrines according to those principles, some amazingly beautiful thoughts and conditions re life. It seems like US have a trust in this traditional govt and expect US to work and live and the govt to uphold law & peace. However, with the ACLFU breaking down standards not just with backing equal rights but with creating an atmosphere of over-tolerence to those breaking the laws, they have opened a door for socialism. Giving equal rights to criminal active persons makes US all on one equal level no distinction between right or wrong. Now we're stuck with a govt off the right track.
2007-01-09 05:47:22
·
answer #5
·
answered by spareo1 4
·
2⤊
3⤋
We have too many presidents that the "cattle" listen to.
President Ignorance
President Status
President Greed
President Vanity
President Sex
President Drug Abuse
President Television
President Video Game Console
2007-01-09 05:39:58
·
answer #6
·
answered by Awesome Bill 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
Actually your not right. We can't even get a large majority of people to vote for important elections. How do you expect to get the population to vote for more trivial issues? Day to Day Government business would cease to exist.
2007-01-09 06:00:15
·
answer #7
·
answered by Jon M 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
1. Because people are lazy. They want others to do things for them.
2. The education system doesn't teach nearly enough about government and citizen action in government.
2007-01-09 05:36:59
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
2⤋
majority rule equals mob rule. Another example of majority rule, 2 wolves and 1 sheep vote on whats for dinner!
2007-01-09 13:10:11
·
answer #9
·
answered by jonn449 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
And you are the only one intelligent enough to invent a Utopia. Right...
2007-01-09 06:06:32
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
so you want a few highly populated areas to rule over the entire country, making rules to benifit themselves, while ignoring the rest unrepresented people?
2007-01-09 05:48:50
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋