I do, how can you not? He is over rated!
2007-01-09 05:48:35
·
answer #1
·
answered by Eho 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
If you know anything about football ( as im sure you do) several small incidents throughout a 60 min game can lead to a shift in advantage. As a coach you dont want your team to be in a situation where you would need some last second miracle.I think i would have to blame the entire team;coordinators for their play calls and the players for the lack of concentration of each play called.I dont blame him(Tony Romo), but i do feel bad for him because for some it looks like he should take all the blame but he really shouldn't..
2007-01-09 05:43:38
·
answer #2
·
answered by DZ 5
·
3⤊
0⤋
I think Tony Romo blames himself.
2007-01-09 08:10:38
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Good question...I'm an Eagles fan..and I would say yes..
Not because of the snap, because the way he played the whole game...Seatle gave them every chance to win that game and he could not take advantage of the seahawks mistakes..
Bill Parcells should not have the starting QB holding kicks..
P.S: Any time Dallas loses it is a awesome thing, when they lose a playoff game it is a super awesome thing..
Go Eagles E-A-G-L-E-S Eagles!!@!!
2007-01-09 05:59:46
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
properly, yeah. whether there have been different factors during the recreation that pointed to different persons, or the team as an entire - Tony Romo will take the blame simply by fact it replaced into this manner of terrible play, and it replaced into the final undertaking that occurred. whether he did attempt annoying to recover from the bobbled carry, it replaced into nevertheless not sufficient, and thanks to it, the recreation replaced into lost.
2016-10-30 10:51:39
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
People will say one play doesn't lose a game like this guy up here but in truth if they would have made the field goal they would be playing next week so I say yes all his fault. Now if he threw an INT on that drive well that would be different but all he had to do was put the ball on the ground with a give me field goal.
2007-01-09 05:47:10
·
answer #6
·
answered by hamthugger 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
don't blame him...he tried to run with the ball after the snap came in on his right and was the ball damp too??
any other holder would have just done the "duh?" and fell on the ball
the guy has to quarterback and hold the snap?? give him a break...he was assigned two jobs and when they started playing him at quarterback...the coaches should have assigned another holder
and the guy was man enough to take the blame on national tv...who else would do that...not many
and it is a team effort...win or lose
2007-01-09 08:11:08
·
answer #7
·
answered by Library Eyes 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
uh yeah, if he holds that snap they win the game...
and he is the qb so he was the one that could've driven for a touchdown too
2007-01-09 05:54:41
·
answer #8
·
answered by Beast8981 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Stop asking the same question over and over again. It's real annoying.
2007-01-09 05:35:49
·
answer #9
·
answered by smellyfoot ™ 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Saftey!!!!!! you reposted this again ...thanks for the 2 points though
2007-01-09 05:36:04
·
answer #10
·
answered by Pierced00 3
·
0⤊
1⤋