English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

just askin cuz i am kind of

2007-01-09 05:30:21 · 16 answers · asked by candy girl 08 1 in Sports Football (American)

16 answers

If you blame him for losing it then you have to blame him for getting you there too!

He's young - this will be good for him. He will be a much stronger player next year.

2007-01-09 05:35:46 · answer #1 · answered by sdmike 5 · 0 1

Well, yeah. Even if there were other factors throughout the game that pointed to other individuals, or the team as a whole - Tony Romo will take the blame because it was such a horrible play, and it was the last thing that happened. Although he did try hard to recover from the bobbled hold, it was still not enough, and because of it, the game was lost.

2007-01-09 05:34:59 · answer #2 · answered by smellyfoot ™ 7 · 0 0

The Blame will go to Romo from alot of the fans ...but its a team game..and the game shouldnt have been in that situation...Romo is still young and just starting his Career as a Starter ...he will come around.

2007-01-09 05:34:30 · answer #3 · answered by Pierced00 3 · 0 0

It is easy to blame one person doing a huge visible mistake. But you can blame players doing some faults causing extra yards to the opponent or losing yards so failing to reach the end zone. Everybody did some mistakes. The result is less point, more point to the other side.

In other words: it is never the fault of a single person. It is the whole team which failed (including the coach and the coaching team).

2007-01-09 05:36:10 · answer #4 · answered by blapath 6 · 0 0

football is a team game so 1 person cant be the blame on his/her own. also, starting quarterbacks in the nfl are not holders for the kicker. Jake plummer was, but he got demoted. when romo got the starting job, he should have lost the holders responsibility.

2007-01-09 05:36:11 · answer #5 · answered by Marty B 4 · 0 0

well he didn't help them in the end if that's what you're asking but at the same time you can't put all of the blame on him as it's a team sport so there's plenty of blame to go around i mean the cowboys defense did allow the seahawks to score the game winning touchdown so there's plenty of blame to go around

2007-01-09 05:34:12 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

well its kinda hard to find anyone else to blame, but both teams could never close out that game. They both had it won several times and couldnt finish it. It doesnt matter bc the hawks will lose in chicago

2007-01-09 05:34:47 · answer #7 · answered by DaDirtySouth 5 · 0 0

Yes i do think he had something to do with the dallas cowboys losing that game.

2007-01-09 05:40:17 · answer #8 · answered by lil boosie 4 · 0 0

yes, he is the one that fumbled the snap on a play that would have given them a lead with about a minute left in the game.

2007-01-09 05:38:24 · answer #9 · answered by rizza_61 1 · 0 0

Who's to blame - it's just a game, nothing of real importance.

2007-01-09 05:33:28 · answer #10 · answered by Jason N 2 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers