and over mike vick?
2007-01-09 05:20:07 · 16 answers · asked by bob 2 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
By default. No one any better.
Mike Vick? Are you kidding me?
2007-01-09 05:24:02 · answer #1 · answered by ? 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I agree with you. Mike Vick had good stats, plus he now holds the record for rushing quarterbacks. Tony Romo was good, but he should have never been picked. All he has done was win a few games, which is the reason they put him in. He hasnt done anything OUTSTANDING or EYE CATCHING! I think they should start picking pro bowlers at the end of the season. The reason he got picked is because the media and the nfl both jumped on a band wagon.
2007-01-09 05:26:43 · answer #2 · answered by Who Dat Chic!! 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Cause Vick sucks as a QB. I was looking at the NFC ballet and at first I was thinking, there is no way Romo goes to the Pro Bowl...but then I looked at who should go in his place...ehh....pretty slim pickings. They should've just let a 4th AFC QB suit up.
Vick once again is at the bottom in QB rating, his accuracy blows, he shows that he is not a winner, and that the Falcons will miss the playoffs or lose in the first round every year he's their starter.
He's a great athlete, the best running QB in NFL history, but sucks as a passer.
2007-01-09 05:25:40 · answer #3 · answered by Berzirk 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Pro Bowl is a bulllllshiiiit thing, dude.
Its nothing more than a popularity contest.
The guy sucks (they call him a rookie, but he's in the league 4 yrs as nothing more than a backup), only played 7 games, and he somehow makes it there.
When youve got 14 yr olds who know nothing about the game voting everyday on line, theres bound to be unworthy players making it there.
Personally, though, i dont think Vick was all that great to make it there either. Even my man, Eli Manning has better stats than Michael Vick.
2007-01-09 05:38:16 · answer #4 · answered by JusticeManEsq 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Because Donovan McNabb got hurt! However im not at all a Cowboys fan but they are way better with Romo than Bledsoe. I gotta lot of love for Micheal Vick but honestly this year he was ok, and in the NFL wins count. Micheal Vick has played better and unfortunately aside from Vick who else had an impact on their team this year. Sucks but i understand
2007-01-09 05:31:10 · answer #5 · answered by DZ 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
People love a feel good story, and Romo is just that. However, Vick is just the opposite. He dissapoints year after year.
2007-01-09 05:28:10 · answer #6 · answered by Brian S 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Mike Vick is garbage.
2007-01-09 05:24:21 · answer #7 · answered by U Luv It 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Umm...lets do it this way.
Jon Kitna's passing yards - 4,208
Mike Vick's passing, rushing, and receiving yards combined - 3,514
Kind of embarrassing in my opinion
but lets compare Romo and Vicks stats
Romo - QB rating of 95.1, Completed 220 passes out of 337, for a completion percent of 65.3, threw for 2903 yards, averaging 181.4 yards per game, that equals 8.6 yards an attempt, threw for 19 touchdowns, and 13 interceptions, sacked 21 times for a loss of 124 yards, fubling 8 times and losing only 3.
Vick - QB rating of 75.7, completing 204 passes out of 388, for a completion percent of 52.6, threw for 2474 yards, averaging 154.6 yards per game, that equals 6.4 yards an attempt, with 20 touchdowns, 13 interceptions, and was sacked 45 times for a loss of 303 yards, fumbling 9 times and losing only 3.
and you say Vick should be in....
2007-01-09 05:31:58 · answer #8 · answered by Tyler E 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
they had to make sure the nfc would lose just like they will in the super bowl.
2007-01-09 05:24:13 · answer #9 · answered by Beast8981 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Dallas Fans voted him in
2007-01-09 05:24:13 · answer #10 · answered by Doofus B 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋